Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Garbled data mars wage claim

- ERIC LITKE

Making the case for his election in a campaign email, gubernator­ial hopeful Andy Gronik cited a racial pay gap as one reason Wisconsin needs new leadership.

Before laying out his pledge to “fight for the rights of everyone in Wisconsin,” Gronik highlighte­d a gap between the earnings of black and white workers.

“When black Americans still earn less than 73 percent of what white men make in America, we have work to do,” the Democratic businessma­n from Fox Point wrote on Aug. 27. “It’s time to stand up and say that people of color deserve all of the opportunit­ies and privileges that the rest of us have.”

In other words, Gronik says the “wage gap” is 27 percentage points between the two races.

Let’s see if Gronik’s numbers add up.

Cited gap doesn’t account for difference­s

When asked for evidence to back up Gronik’s claim, a Gronik spokesman pointed to a 2016 Pew Research Center report.

But the candidate’s email misstates the comparison. The email compares “black Americans” with just white men, while the Pew report is saying black men have 73% the hourly earnings of white men.

The Pew report uses 2015 data and is based on median hourly earnings for each race. It does not take into account difference­s between the education levels of white and black workers, their experience, occupation

or other factors.

(The unadjusted earnings data from Pew showed Asian men earn 117% what white men do and Hispanic men earn 69% what white men do.)

“From a statistica­l standpoint you’d want to compare apples v. apples, and those comparison­s with unadjusted data would be comparing apples to oranges really,” said Mark Perry, a scholar at the American Enterprise Institute and professor of economics at the University of Michigan-Flint. “You’re not controllin­g for any of the factors that could explain difference­s in earnings.”

The left-leaning Economic Policy Institute, a nonprofit think tank, examines these factors each year and put the blackwhite wage gap at 14.5% for 2016. The calculatio­n controls for gender, race, education, experience and geographic division.

Their data shows the gap has steadily widened in recent years. The wage gap was around 9% in the late 1970s and 10% in the 1980s, rising to a record 15.2% in 2015 before dropping slightly in 2016.

The wage gap varies greatly between men and women. The institute’s detailed 2016 study tabbed the gap as 22% between white men and black men and 11.7% between white women and black women, when adjusted for education, experience, metro status and region.

Difference­s in factors such as education and experience levels explained only about onefourth of the black-white wage gap for men and one-third for women, the study said.

The study struggled to identify a cause for the rest, saying the gaps are growing due to either discrimina­tion “or racial difference­s in skills or worker characteri­stics that are unobserved or unmeasured in the data.”

Segments show larger, smaller gaps

More detailed data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics shows the wage gap rises and falls between various educationa­l and occupation­al groups.

Examples from a 2016 comparison of median weekly earnings:

» Among college graduates, black workers earned 78% of what their white counterpar­ts earned.

» Among those with less than a high school diploma, black workers earned 89% of what their white counterpar­ts earned.

» Black workers in management, profession­al and related occupation­s earned 80% of what white workers did.

PolitiFact on TODAY’S TMJ 4

You can watch PolitiFact Wisconsin segments on Wednesday and Friday evenings during the TODAY’S TMJ 4 Live at 6 newscast.

» Black workers in natural resources, constructi­on and maintenanc­e occupation­s earned 93% of what white workers did.

» Black men earned 76% of what white men did overall.

» Black women earned 84% of what white women did overall.

Our rating

Gronik said “black Americans still earn less than 73 percent of what white men make.”

His claim runs into problems on several levels. First, he garbled the statistic, comparing all black workers to only white men. He also referred to unadjusted earnings data, which does not account for difference­s between workers’ experience and background­s that explain some of the wage gap.

He also used 2015 data, when 2016 data is available from various sources.

But his central point — that there is an observable difference between what black workers and white workers make — is supported by the data. Experts vary in their methodolog­ies and definition of a wage gap, and more nuanced calculatio­ns show it is notably smaller than the figure Gronik cited. But a gap does exist, both between all workers and between workers who are similarly situated.

We rate Gronik’s claim Half True.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States