Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Donations fall short of bias

- Tom Kertscher Email: tkertscher@journal sentinel.com Twitter: twitter.com/ kertschern­ews Facebook: fb.com/politifact wisconsin

U.S. Rep. Sean Duffy, a northern Wisconsin Republican who has consistent­ly backed Donald Trump, is making Democrat-bias allegation­s about a man who may pose a threat to Trump’s presidency: special counsel Robert Mueller.

On Monday, Mueller’s investigat­ion produced its first criminal charges, its first guilty plea and the first public confirmati­on that an aide to Trump’s campaign sought an allegiance with Russians to gather “dirt” on Hillary Clinton.

Duffy made his claim about Mueller the same day on CNN’s “New Day” show. He referred to Clinton, Trump’s Democratic rival in the 2016 election, and the Democratic National Committee, saying:

First of all, I support the investigat­ion; I’m not asking for it to end. But I do have concerns that Mueller’s bringing in Democrat campaign donors at a very high level …. And I think that’s a mistake on his part. Let’s bring in non-partisan folks that — or at least don’t have a partisan record because I think you open yourself up to criticism in making it partisan.

So, how many of Mueller’s lawyers have made campaign contributi­ons to Democrats, and how much?

And is there evidence of a partisan bias on Mueller’s team?

The charges and plea

Duffy’s interview was prompted by the most significan­t developmen­ts for the special counsel, who is investigat­ing possible ties between Trump’s presidenti­al campaign and Russia.

Former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort and his business associate, Rick Gates, were indicted on a dozen felony counts, including money laundering. And George Papadopoul­os, a foreign policy adviser to the campaign, pleaded guilty to misleading the FBI about outreach efforts to Russian government officials.

Papadopoul­os is accused of falsely telling the FBI he was not part of the Trump campaign when a person described as an “overseas professor” told him that Russians possessed “dirt” on Clinton, in the form of “thousands of emails.”

As for Mueller, the special counsel’s office told us that it confirmed that Mueller is a longtime and current Republican. He is a former federal prosecutor who served as the FBI director under presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama, from 2001 to 2013. He was a partner at the WilmerHale law firm when he was chosen as the special counsel by the U.S. Justice Department in May.

Previous claim about the team

A month after Mueller’s selection, Trump implied the investigat­ion was politicall­y motivated, making a claim more extreme than Duffy’s in saying: “I can say that the people that have been hired (for the independen­t Russia investigat­ion) are all Hillary Clinton supporters, some of them worked for Hillary Clinton.”

PolitiFact National rated Trump’s statement Mostly False.

At that point, the names of eight lawyers on Mueller’s team had been made public. Three had made campaign contributi­ons to Clinton, but none had worked for her. One had defended the Clinton Foundation in court for WilmerHale. And another represente­d a Clinton aide, also for WilmerHale.

The Justice Department looked into the contributi­ons and employment histories of all of Mueller’s hires and determined them consistent with the rules of profession­al responsibi­lity.

Duffy’s claim is a little more broad.

Mueller’s team and their contributi­ons

Duffy’s office referred us to news reports on campaign contributi­ons made by Mueller team members. The special counsel’s office told us that Mueller has 16 lawyers on his team, but that one of them has not been named publicly. That office provided us figures on how much the lawyers have given in total to Democrats and Republican­s in federal campaigns. We also checked Federal Election Commission filings. Here’s what we found:

Six of the 15 lawyers have not made campaign contributi­ons to any political campaigns at the federal level.

Among the lawyers who did make contributi­ons, a total of $62,043 went to Democrats and $2,750 to Republican­s, according to the special counsel’s office.

In terms of Clinton specifical­ly, election filings indicate that three lawyers gave her 2016 presidenti­al campaign a total of $700; and three gave a total of $18,100 to either her 2016 campaign or her 2008 run for the presidenti­al nomination.

As for the implicatio­n of Duffy’s claim, here are points worth noting:

One of the lawyers was a member of the team that won the 2015 conviction on federal corruption charges of Sheldon Silver, a Democrat who had been the longtime speaker of the New York State Assembly.

The special counsel’s office pointed out to us that the legal standards for Justice Department hiring “prohibit the use of political or ideologica­l affiliatio­ns to assess applicants.”

On that point, the Washington Post Fact Checker reported, in a June fact check on this issue:

Federal regulation­s prohibit the Justice Department from considerin­g the political affiliatio­n or political contributi­ons of career appointees, including those appointed to the Special Counsel’s Office. So the implicatio­n that Mueller is making politicall­y motivated hires is quite a stretch, as he is legally prohibited from considerin­g their political affiliatio­ns.

Our rating

Duffy says Mueller “has brought in Democrat campaign donors at a very high level” on his team of lawyers.

Six of the 15 lawyers who have been publicly identified have not made campaign contributi­ons to any political campaigns at the federal level. But among the lawyers who did make contributi­ons, a total of $62,043 went to Democrats and $2,750 to Republican­s, according to the special counsel’s office.

As for a Democratic bias in the investigat­ion, Duffy doesn’t specifical­ly make that charge. But Mueller himself is a longtime Republican. And he is prohibited from choosing lawyers based on political affiliatio­ns.

For a statement that is partially accurate, our rating is Half True.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States