Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

AT&T uncertain when Time Warner deal will close

Feds want company to sell assets such as CNN, sources say

- Tali Arbel See AT&T, Page 11A

YORK – AT&T says it’s uncertain when its $85 billion deal for Time Warner will close, making investors worry that regulators may try to block it or require significan­t changes.

Reports from The New York Times, CNN and other outlets, citing unidentifi­ed people, said the Justice Department wants to require the companies to sell Turner Broadcasti­ng, owner of CNN, TBS and TNT; or to sell satellite TV provider DirecTV, which AT&T bought in 2015.

AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson said in a statement, “I have never offered to sell CNN and have no intention of doing so.” AT&T, Time Warner and the Justice Department did not immediatel­y respond to other questions.

AT&T had previously targeted the end of the year for closing the deal, and Wall Street analysts had widely expectNEW ed the deal to go through. Obama-era regulators in 2011 approved a similar media merger, cable company Comcast’s purchase of NBCUnivers­al, after Comcast agreed to a slew of business requiremen­ts.

At an investors conference Wednesday, AT&T Chief Financial Officer John Stephens said he could not comment on discussion­s with Justice, which he described as continuing.

“But with those discussion­s, I can now say that the timing of the closing of the deal is now uncertain,” he added.

If AT&T and Justice cannot agree to conditions, Justice can sue to block the deal.

Time Warner shares dropped 6.5 percent to $88.50 on Wednesday. AT&T stock rose 1.1 percent, to $33.44.

The Justice Department’s new antitrust chief, Makan Delrahim, has said he prefers “structural” changes to a deal, such as selling off assets, rather than having the government monitor a company’s promises to abide by certain conditions, as was done with Comcast. Requiring AT&T to sell either Turner or DirecTV would be in line with Delrahim’s thinking.

Objections to the deal have also raised suspicions of political retaliatio­n.

President Donald Trump has often blasted CNN for its coverage of him and his administra­tion, disparagin­g it and its reporters as “fake news.” As a candidate, Trump vowed to block the deal because it concentrat­ed too much “power in the hands of too few.”

“While there are plenty of good reasons to oppose AT&T’s Time Warner takeover, punishing CNN for trying to hold this administra­tion accountabl­e isn’t one of them,” said Craig Aaron president of the consumer group Free Press, which opposes the deal and media consolidat­ion in general.

Sen. Brian Schatz, a Democrat from Hawaii, tweeted that “Presidenti­al power must be used wisely and fairly. I don’t know the details here but this is worth investigat­ing.”

AT&T hopes to benefit from marrying all of Time Warner’s assets to its own. It would then supply its video — HBO, CNN, TBS and the Warner Bros. movie studio — while providing access to the internet for millions of Americans.

Consumer groups, some TV networks and some conservati­ve groups have criticized the deal, saying it would hurt consumers by allowing AT&T to discrimina­te against TV networks it doesn’t own or raise prices on other cable and satellite TV companies for its programmin­g. Several Democratic lawmakers have pushed back against the combinatio­n.

Forcing a sale of CNN could harm the news network if a buyer doesn’t have the same deep pockets as AT&T and Time Warner to support newsgather­ing.

Being forced to sell off Turner is probably a “nonstarter” for AT&T, New Street Research analyst Jonathan Chaplin said. He said the company has “very good” prospects of winning in court against the Justice Department. “It’s difficult to imagine an antitrust argument that will be compelling” from the government, he said.

AT&T has long noted that “vertical mergers” — when one company buys another that isn’t a direct competitor — are typically approved.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States