Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Panel clears way for Keystone pipeline

- Dan Egan of the Journal Sentinel staff contribute­d to this report.

LINCOLN, Neb. – A Nebraska commission approved an alternativ­e route for the Keystone XL oil pipeline through the state on Monday, removing the last major regulatory obstacle to building the long-delayed $8 billion project.

The Nebraska Public Service Commission’s vote on the project could still be challenged in court. Opponents also said another federal review may be needed because the approved route would run farther north than the preferred route proposed by TransCanad­a Corp., which wants to build a 1,179mile pipeline from Canada across several U.S. states.

“This decision opens up a whole new bag of issues that we can raise,” said Ken Winston, an attorney representi­ng environmen­tal groups that have long opposed the project.

Still, the commission’s 3-2 vote likely clears the way for the company to gain access to the property of holdout landowners in Nebraska who vehemently oppose the pipeline, using the state’s eminent domain laws. More than 90% of Nebraska landowners along the route have agreed to let TransCanad­a bury the pipeline beneath their property, but those who oppose it have managed to thwart the project for years.

The ruling comes at a time when oil pipelines and private property rights are emerging as contentiou­s issues in Wisconsin as well. TransCanad­a Corp. rival Enbridge Inc. owns an 80-footwide easement across the state that cradles several pipes collective­ly capable of carrying nearly three times the volume of the proposed Keystone XL.

Enbridge says it has no plans to add another Wisconsin pipeline, which would likely require an expansion of the easement that would chew into private properties across the state. But the Canadian company has already done initial survey work should it decide to add a Wisconsin line as it brings ever-increasing amounts of Canadian oil into its distributi­on center at Superior, Wis.

The Nebraska pipeline approved Monday also faces intense opposition from American Indian tribes, but business groups and some unions support the project as a way to create jobs and reduce the risk of shipping the oil by trains that can derail.

President Donald Trump issued a federal permit allowing for the project in March, reversing President Barack Obama administra­tion’s rejection of it. TransCanad­a had said that it would announce in late November or early December whether it planned to proceed with building the pipeline, taking into account the Nebraska decision and whether it has lined up enough long-term contracts to ship oil.

Jane Kleeb, director of the pipeline opposition group the Bold Alliance, said her group believes TransCanad­a will have to seek another federal re-

“This decision opens up a whole new bag of issues that we can raise.” Ken Winston Attorney representi­ng environmen­tal groups

view of the route, a process that would add even more years to the timetable. The mainline alternativ­e approved Monday includes 63 miles of new pipeline that hasn’t been reviewed by the federal government.

Opponents are expected to appeal the Nebraska commission’s decision in a state district court, and the case is likely to end up before the Nebraska Supreme Court. The commission was forbidden by law from considerin­g a recent oil spill in South Dakota on the existing Keystone pipeline in its decision.

The proposed Keystone XL would expand the existing Keystone pipeline, which went into service in July 2010. The current pipeline network runs south through North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas, Oklahoma and Texas and extends east into Missouri and Illinois.

The new pipeline would carry an estimated 830,000 barrels of oil a day from the oil sands areas of Canada through Montana, South Dakota and Nebraska, where it would connect with the existing Keystone pipeline. The pipeline would then continue through Kansas, Oklahoma and Texas to the coast.

TransCanad­a has said its route through Nebraska is the most direct way to transport oil from Alberta, Canada, to an existing pipeline in Steele City, Neb.

The commission decision was based on evidence presented at a public hearing in August. The elected commission is composed of four Republican­s and one Democrat.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States