Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Impeach or not — your reps chime in

State delegation’s views differ on Ukraine, inquiry

- Craig Gilbert

WASHINGTON – The U.S. House of Representa­tives has launched an impeachmen­t inquiry into President Trump. Here’s a summary of where Wisconsin’s elected representa­tives to Congress stand on the impeachmen­t inquiry and the issues driving it.

Their comments below are drawn from lawmakers’ written statements, comments on social media, comments at public events, and interviews with the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel — and were made at varying points amid fastmoving developmen­ts.

These include the Sept. 24 announceme­nt of an impeachmen­t inquiry, the subsequent release of a summary record of President Donald Trump’s phone call asking the leader of Ukraine to investigat­e Democratic rival Joe Biden and the whistleblo­wer complaint about the call, and Trump’s public call on Thursday for China to start an investigat­ion of Biden.

Wisconsin’s eight House districts represent different segments of the state’s electorate with varying degrees of public support for and opposition to the president.

Three districts are represente­d by Democrats, four by Republican­s, and one (the 7th Congressio­nal District in northern Wisconsin) was represente­d by Republican Sean Duffy until his retirement last month — and is now vacant.

Sen. Ron Johnson (Republican)

Johnson is chairman of the Senate foreign relations Europe subcommitt­ee and a member of the Senate’s Ukraine Caucus who has traveled to that country several times. He contends that Trump was not improperly using his office to pressure Ukraine to investigat­e Biden.

“I realize the Democrats (and) a lot of members of the press are putting the worst possible constructi­on on everything about (the phone call with Ukraine). … I’ve been involved in (Ukraine). … I’ve had direct contact with (their) president. I never got any sense at all there was any kind of pressure on him. I just put the best constructi­on on the call. I know how (Trump) talks. That’s who he is,” Johnson told the Journal Sentinel on Sept. 26.

Johnson says he lobbied Trump to free up aid to Ukraine while Trump was withholdin­g it but rejects the idea that Trump was using the aid to pressure that country for dirt on Biden. Johnson told the Wall Street Journal Oct. 4 that he heard from the U.S. ambassador to the European Union that the frozen aid was being used to pressure Ukraine to conduct investigat­ions Trump sought into the 2016 U.S. election, but that when he asked Trump about that, the president strongly denied any quid pro quo.

Asked Oct. 3 about Trump’s urging China to investigat­e Biden, Johnson told reporters, “I don’t think there’s anything improper about doing that.” Aides said later that was a general comment on requests by presidents for help from other countries with ongoing investigat­ions, not on Trump’s specific comments. But Johnson declined to criticize Trump over his China remarks.

Sen. Tammy Baldwin (Democrat)

Baldwin announced her support for a House impeachmen­t inquiry on Sept. 24.

“The White House call memo confirms what was revealed … in the whistleblo­wer complaint — President Trump solicited interferen­ce from Ukraine in our 2020 election. This is a serious abuse of power that risks our national security and weakens efforts to protect our Democracy.” Baldwin said on Twitter Sept. 26.

She spoke again on Twitter on Oct. 3 after the president’s statements urging China to investigat­e Biden.

“This is your democracy and we should stand united and put our country first, sending a clear message to (Trump) and the rest of the world that we will not tolerate foreign interferen­ce from Ukraine, China or any foreign country in our American elections,” she said.

Rep. Bryan Steil (Republican)

1st Congressio­nal District: The southeaste­rn corner of the state, bounded by Janesville in the west, Kenosha and Racine in the east, and the southweste­rn suburbs of Milwaukee in the north.

“Speaker Pelosi and House Democrats are putting political theater over the issues impacting the American people. If Speaker Pelosi wants to move forward with the impeachmen­t inquiry, she should bring the resolution to the House floor and have every Member of Congress put their name on the line. I do not support the ongoing impeachmen­t investigat­ion. Under Speaker Pelosi’s direction, six House committees are focusing on more investigat­ions rather than lowering prescripti­on drug costs, fixing our southern border, and reining in federal spending.” (statement, Oct. 3)

Rep. Mark Pocan (Democrat)

2nd Congressio­nal District: anchored by the city of Madison but extends to six other counties south and west of Dane County

Pocan first called for an impeachmen­t inquiry in May, accusing the president of stonewalli­ng Congress regarding Russian interferen­ce in the 2016 election.

“The president in this case not only broke the law by asking a foreign government to manufactur­e evidence against a political opponent, he’s also openly admitted it, which puts us in a very different territory . ... In this case it’s crystal clear by his own admission,” Pocan said in a Sept. 24 interview.

“He renewed his call to the Ukrainian government and now threw in China. We think he’s trying to normalize it somehow, but it’s not normal. It’s a violation of the oath of office and it’s a crime,” Pocan said a town hall meeting Oct. 3 in Dodgeville.

Rep. Ron Kind (Democrat)

3rd Congressio­nal District: a predominat­ely southweste­rn Wisconsin seat that also stretches into the central Wisconsin cities of Stevens Point and Wisconsin Rapids.

Kind has criticized the president’s conduct and endorsed a House investigat­ion but not explicitly backed an “impeachmen­t” inquiry.

“As we continue to learn more details about the President’s alarming actions, I remain extremely concerned that the President actively coerced a foreign government to meddle in our election and then tried to cover it up. It’s more vital than ever for Congress to get all the facts it can and I will continue to support Congress’s ongoing investigat­ions into the whistleblo­wer complaint. As a former special prosecutor, I believe it is important for Congress to complete its investigat­ion before we make any decision of this magnitude.” (Statement to the media, Sept. 27)

Rep. Gwen Moore (Democrat)

4th Congressio­nal District: city of Milwaukee and most of the suburban communitie­s in the northern half of Milwaukee County.

Moore had come out in support of an impeachmen­t inquiry well before the Ukraine controvers­y.

“It’s clear that Trump tried to bully a foreign leader into investigat­ing his political rival to better his 2020 bid,” she said on Twitter Sept. 26 after the release of the whistleblo­wer complaint.

“I absolutely will vote to impeach the president,” she said in an interview aired Sept. 29 on WISN Channel 12. “It’s not just that we don’t like this man. This man is a national security threat. This man is dangerous to our democracy and to our foreign policy, our allegiance­s around the world.”

Rep. Jim Sensenbren­ner (Republican)

5th Congressio­nal District: the communitie­s on the west and northwest periphery of Milwaukee, including most of Waukesha County and all of Washington County.

Sensenbren­ner says he would be troubled if there were a “quid pro quo” involved in the president’s request that Ukraine investigat­e Biden and his son, Hunter. But he contends there was none.

“The Democrats have been searching for any alleged ‘impeachabl­e’ offense since the beginning of the Trump Presidency. I expect the Judiciary Committee and others will continue their partisan investigat­ions, tarnishing Congress’s credibilit­y and further dividing the country,” he said in a Sept. 24 statement.

In an interview with the Journal Sentinel Sept. 26, he said the Ukraine controvers­y was “made up by people who have been spending two and half year trying to get Trump.”

Rep. Glenn Grothman (Republican)

6th Congressio­nal District: an east-central Wisconsin seat that includes the cities of Fond du Lac, Manitowoc and Port Washington.

“I was disappoint­ed to see Speaker Pelosi move forward with impeachmen­t proceeding­s. ... We know that probably every Democrat in the House voted for Secretary Clinton in 2016 and the endless string of investigat­ions in the House are a reaction to that election. But, the fact remains that the important business before the House has ground to a halt due to these distractio­ns . ... I do think there are legitimate questions to be raised as why Hunter Biden was employed by Ukrainian-based gas company, Burisma Holdings, at the same time his father oversaw Ukrainian relations for the Obama Administra­tion, and why was Ukrainian prosecutor, Viktor Shokin, fired during this time period?” (Sept. 25 statement)

Rep. Mike Gallagher (Republican)

8th Congressio­nal District: a northeast Wisconsin seat that includes the Fox Valley region and city of Green Bay and stretches north to the Michigan border. “The question of impeachmen­t is serious business, and Congress must be responsibl­e in how it discharges this authority. Unfortunat­ely, Democratic Leadership rushed to judgment, and called for impeachmen­t before getting all the facts. Already, many of the anonymousl­y sourced media reports have proven to be false. A matter as grave as impeachmen­t demands deliberati­on, seriousnes­s, and reliance on hard evidence and not the amateur theatrics and partisan hysteria we have seen so far — that goes both for my Democratic colleagues, the media, as well as for allies of the administra­tion. It is imperative that we rely on establishe­d processes and laws in our oversight duties, and not the passions of social media . ... The more transparen­cy we have, the better.” (statement, Sept. 25).

 ??  ?? Sensen- brenner
Sensen- brenner
 ??  ?? Johnson
Johnson
 ??  ?? Baldwin
Baldwin
 ??  ?? Steil
Steil
 ??  ?? Pocan
Pocan
 ??  ?? Kind
Kind
 ??  ?? Moore
Moore
 ??  ?? Grothman
Grothman
 ??  ?? Gallagher
Gallagher

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States