Yes, state’s dentists were deemed essential

During the political upheaval over when, how and how fast to reopen Wisconsin, there was a point on May 11 when Gov. Tony Evers relaxed his stayat-home order to allow small retail establishments to reopen, so long as they limited shoppers to five or fewer.

The state Supreme Court later voted 4-3 to toss out Evers’ order entirely, saying his administration had to work with the GOP-controlled Legislature on any continued restrictions.

In the wake of Evers’ May 11 action, state Rep. Janel Brandtjen, R-Menomonee Falls, offered this tweet targeted at Evers: @Gov Evers liquor stores are open, strip malls can have 5 customers, but dentists are non-essential?!

Is she right?

Were dentists considered nonessential under the safer-at-home order?

The short answer: No.

The governor’s executive order

Let’s start with the order itself: Executive Order #28.

Under Section 13, essential businesses include health care and public health operations. And, elsewhere within the order, dental offices are classified under

health care and as public health operations. So, that order did not block dentists from seeing patients.

Meanwhile, an online map from the American Dental Association that tracks the extent to which dentists nationwide have been able to offer services shows the vast majority of states, including Wisconsin, allowing elective and emergency procedures. Of those, as of May 14 the map showed seven states allowing only emergency procedures. (No state had dentist offices closed entirely.)

Beyond that, Wisconsin is listed among only four states – including California, Rhode Island and Delaware – that explicitly designated dentists as essential.

That said, the American Dental Association has recommended dentists remain open only for emergency procedures and postpone elective procedures. And the Wisconsin Dental Association follows ADA recommendations.

Similarly, the state Department of Health Services recommends dentists follow guidelines from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which include postponing elective procedures and non-emergency visits.

So, on a practical level, many dentist offices held off on doing routine visits, such as cleanings and checkups. But that was due to their own choice, and consistent with guidelines from dental groups and health agencies. It was not forbidden under Evers’ order.

When asked for backup for the claim that dentists were deemed nonessential, Brandtjen didn’t cite the order itself.

Rather, in an email, she said Wisconsin dentists planned to start opening their offices in early May, but claimed the state Department of Health Services notified the Dentistry Examining Board that those who did could put their licenses in jeopardy.

Jennifer Garrett, communications director for the Department of Safety and Professional Services, said examining board members were advised by legal counsel May 6 that dentists should follow DHS guidelines, and could face penalties if they did not.

But, as evidence, that is off point, particularly with such a narrow claim.

As noted, the Evers order declared dentists essential — the opposite of what Brandtjen claimed.

Our rating

Brandtjen tweeted that under orders from Evers, dentists were classified as nonessential, and therefore had to remain closed.

But Evers’ order — unlike those from many other governors — explicitly declared dentists, like other health care workers, were essential. Thus, they were allowed to stay open, even if many chose to limit their offerings to emergency work.

We rate Brandtjen’s claim False.