Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Friend should be glad pals are getting vaccinated

- Ask Carolyn Carolyn Hax

Dear Carolyn: I don’t know how to deal with my feelings about how the COVID-19 vaccinatio­ns are rolling out. I have a very close group of friends, none of whom are high-risk. A couple have managed to get vaccinated through what I think is some level of abuse of privilege. One is a doctor, but hasn’t seen a live patient or stepped into a store since March, but qualified for a vaccine because she’s affiliated with a hospital that offered them. Another also-fully-remote worker, who does not leave the house, lives in a state that allows the public to volunteer at vaccinatio­n centers and offers them a vaccine, which feels problemati­c because only so many people can volunteer a full day of time.

I’m conflicted because ideally I think everyone who wants to should be able to get vaccinated right now as doses sit on shelves. But something about these specific stories isn’t sitting right with me. I’ve reacted by just not participat­ing in this group’s conversati­ons, but is there a better way? – Anonymous

Anonymous: Yes. Release it. Let go of any sense of responsibi­lity for individual outcomes like this. Tell your friends, “Good for you,” and be glad for each micro-step toward collective immunity that isn’t slam-dunk-grotesquel­y entitled: bit.ly/VxFakers.

The rules are the rules and neither you nor your friends made them. When the rules serve a legitimate opportunit­y, it makes sense to take it.

You are certainly entitled not to, in hopes that your dose will go to someone you believe needs it more.

But neither you nor your friends would have any say in who gets the shots you turn down, if anyone, so who’s to say your sacrifice serves a greater good? The only certainty you have is that shots need to find arms, so when your number is called, it’s OK to stand up and say “Here!” And maybe jump up and down and wave.

I answer this question at my peril, because I file in advance and to call current events “subject to change” these days is understate­ment to the point of hilarity.

But there’s a theme here that will outlast the vaccine-rollout story, and leads to another point:

When something dominates the national news, it’s common to feel highly engaged but also mostly, if not entirely, helpless. We feel it but we can’t fix it. So our very normal, healthy impulses to do something start to wander around, looking for a place to go.

And like any entity with a lot of energy and nothing to do, these impulses start to cause trouble around the neighborho­od. Namely, we can feel very tempted to judge, correct, fixate on, fume at and try to micromanag­e what we see, or rename it Karen. Our friends, relatives, neighbors, colleagues, that guy behind us in the checkout line.

Sometimes bystanders must get involved, of course, as the last line of defense against bullies, abusers, even terrorists. But most of the time, and especially when the impact of the person we’re correcting is drop-in-the-bucket negligible — or when the stakes are highly abstract — we risk doing more harm by butting in than by a strategic choice to look the other way. Our affectionate ties to others, after all, are the most potent, underrated weapon we have against just about every threat we face as people.

So when you catch your sense of righteousn­ess loitering outside the minimart, looking for trouble, please call it home and find it something constructi­ve to do.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States