Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Evers needs to veto some parts of ‘sporting freedom’ package

- Outdoors Paul A. Smith Milwaukee Journal Sentinel USA TODAY NETWORK – WIS.

There was a splash at the Capitol on Oct. 13 when Ted Nugent, a.k.a. the Motor City Madman, came to Mad City to tout a slew of hunting, fishing and gun rights bills.

Love him or hate him, the “Nuge” creates a buzz at every appearance, which was no doubt part of the goal of Hunter Nation, the Kansas-based group which helped draft the 13 measures in the “sporting freedom” package.

Keith Mark, a Kansas resident and founder of Hunter Nation, was also present. Nugent serves on the organizati­on’s advisory board.

So the spectacle that day in the Badger State’s hall of democracy featured 16 giddy Wisconsin legislator­s – all Republican – gathered for a media event with an out-of-state rocker and the founder of an out-of-state hunting advocacy group.

Not a single Wisconsin hunting, fishing or conservati­on group was included.

Nor, to point out the obvious, was even one of the bills introduced by a Democrat.

The proposals included calls to increase stocking of brook trout and ringnecked pheasants, altering the spring wild turkey hunting framework, eliminatin­g the in-person requiremen­t for youth hunter education testing, allowing a sandhill crane hunt and “universal carry” of firearms.

In the days that followed it became clear just how completely Wisconsin organizati­ons had been shut out of the process.

At an Oct. 19 legislativ­e hearing, a procession of Wisconsin’s leading hunting, fishing and conservati­on groups said they had no prior knowledge of the bills.

“Having not been consulted, we have questions,” said Tony Blattler, chairman of the Wisconsin Conservati­on Congress.

Other Wisconsin-based organizati­ons were past the point of asking. They were opposed to many of the bills.

You should know about another Madison meeting on the proposed legislatio­n.

This one was held Oct. 25 and was called by Gov. Tony Evers. And it did include Wisconsin-based conservati­on organizati­ons.

The governor was there, along with representa­tives of the Wisconsin Wildlife Federation, National Wild Turkey Federation, Pheasants Forever, Trout Unlimited, Wisconsin Hunter Education Instructor­s Associatio­n and the Wisconsin Conservati­on Congress.

Gov. Evers gave each group the floor and listened to their positions, said several of those present at the meeting.

The WWF, the state’s largest coalition of hunting, fishing and conservati­on groups, was against several of the bills, including those to increase brook trout and pheasant stocking and changing the turkey regulation­s.

The bill to essentiall­y triple the number of pheasants stocked to 200,000 a year, for example, has no funding attached to it and the DNR is not capable of raising or planting that many birds with current staffing and facilities.

With regard to the turkey hunting bill, the NWTF, the state and nation’s largest turkey hunting organizati­on, opposed the proposal to change the spring turkey season format. The NWTF based its position on surveys showing longstandi­ng satisfacti­on among Wisconsin turkey hunters with the current hunting regulation­s, as well as concern that adding hunting pressure early in the season could harm the birds’ reproducti­on.

Trout Unlimited opposed the brook trout stocking proposal (also unfunded), noting the state hatchery system didn’t have space and, to best serve the anglers of Wisconsin, “fisheries management should be based on science, allowed to change over time, and not dictated by meeting an arbitrary annual stocking quota,” the group said.

Representa­tives of the Wisconsin Hunter Education Instructor­s Associatio­n reiterated their belief that it’s best to require youth hunters to pass an inperson test to obtain their hunter safety certificate, rather than allow a mentored hunt with an untrained person take its place.

And so it went. Each of the Wisconsin groups that had time to formulate a position asked Gov. Evers to veto at least one of the proposals.

As of last week, the Senate and Assembly had passed most of the bills in the “sporting freedom” package.

They now go to Gov. Evers who can sign them into law or veto them.

You won’t find a person in the Wisconsin conservati­on community who will say all our state’s rules and regulation­s are perfect.

But the tactics used by Hunter Nation and Republican legislator­s to introduce these bills, as well as the content of many of them, is a slap in the face to our state’s motto “Forward.”

And if they were primarily a political strategy designed to get Gov. Evers to veto them and then try to cast him as “anti-sportsman” in the fall campaign, that is primed to backfire.

Conservati­on groups representi­ng the bulk of Wisconsin sportsmen and women know the truth and they have spoken. They’ve asked the governor to veto many of the proposals.

If and when he does, make sure to thank him.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States