Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Eilish is right: Pornograph­y hurts America’s children The effects of porn

Singer’s experience more common than many realize

- Your Turn Theresa Olohan Guest columnist ECKENROTH/FILMMAGIC RODIN

This column is part of an ongoing series by USA TODAY Opinion exploring the mental health crisis facing Americans.

In December, French authoritie­s promised to block five major porn sites if they didn’t take immediate action to ensure that viewers are 18 and older. This news came shortly after Billie Eilish’s denunciati­on of pornograph­y, which shocked many of the 20-year-old singer’s fans.

Aside from the novelty of a celebrity acknowledg­ing the pitfalls of pornograph­y consumptio­n, people were horrified to hear that Eilish was exposed to sexually explicit acts online when she was only 11 years old.

Yet her experience is far more common than many Americans seem to realize. According to a study by the Crimes Against Children Research Center at the University of New Hampshire, 93% of boys and 62% of girls are exposed to pornograph­y before age 18.

What about younger children? It will be years until we know how many children are being exposed to pornograph­y, according to Dawn Hawkins, CEO of the National Center on Sexual Exploitati­on. Studies on this age group are unethical, she told me, which restricts the availabili­ty of data for researcher­s.

“They’re asking people who are like 18 about their experience­s when they were 6,” Hawkins said. “But those who are 18 and in their early 20s right now, they didn’t have smartphone­s when they were 6, like our 6-year-olds do now. So, it will be a couple more years until we’re able to really understand the scope of how many of our younger children are being exposed. But we do know it’s a lot.”

Anecdotall­y, we know that children are introduced to mature content at startlingl­y young ages. Robin Reber is a director of Star Guides Wilderness, a camp specializi­ng in treating youth struggling with addictions. She told me that she has talked with countless parents who have called her weeping, distraught to discover that their children are struggling with pornograph­y. She received a surge in phone calls from parents seeking help for children as young as 7 during the pandemic.

These experience­s are not anomalies, and they’re destroying kids.

Young children who view pornograph­y frequently disengage from their family and start to isolate more, Hawkins said, noting that these children often become withdrawn, sullen or depressed.

Pro-pornograph­y advocates argue that porn is not inherently harmful, that it can be used as sex education, and they suggest there are other benefits to watching porn.

Studies by organizati­ons such as Fight the New Drug, however, show that porn is extremely addictive, that it can damage relationsh­ips and intimacy, and that it can increase the likelihood of infidelity. One study found that 56% of divorce cases involved a spouse who had an “obsessive interest” in pornograph­y.

According to research from Fight the New Drug, porn desensitiz­es viewers, requiring them to watch more novel content to experience the same reaction. For example, 46.9% of respondent­s in a 2016 study reported that over time they began watching pornograph­y that had previously been uninterest­ing or even disgusting to them.

Porn has also been found to cause developmen­tal problems, body image issues as well as erectile dysfunctio­n. If these are consequenc­es of adults’ pornograph­y consumptio­n, the consequenc­es of viewing pornograph­y are likely worse for children whose understand­ing of relationsh­ips and sex is still being shaped.

For example, studies suggest that porn normalizes sexual objectification and distorts healthy views of sex because of violent and aggressive content. The warped scripts in pornograph­y are extremely harmful for young viewers, Hawkins said, because it teaches them to expect and desire aggression during sex.

“It is changing their sexual templates,” she said. “It’s impacting who they’re talking to, how they’re attracted, what kinds of acts they want to engage in.”

Billie Eilish said as much in her recent comments: “The first few times I, you know, had sex, I was not saying no to things that were not good. And it’s because I thought that’s what I was supposed to be attracted to.”

Despite these sobering trends, porn use has grown increasing­ly acceptable in our culture, and the convergenc­e of online access, social media and smartphone­s have contribute­d to its alarming

Singer-songwriter Billie Eilish on Dec. 4, 2021, in Los Angeles. ease of accessibil­ity.

Parents have told Reber that their children were first exposed to pornograph­y by predators on social media sites, and others first viewed porn at a friend’s house. Many boys are introduced to porn through friends they meet in online gaming.

Some children are exposed at school. The Washington Post reported that a 9year-old boy in Maryland was able to access hundreds of pornograph­ic sites on his school-issued laptop, and an 11-yearold boy used the search engine Ecosia to view sites with pornograph­ic images. Both incidents occurred despite school administra­tors’ claims that they use filters to block objectiona­ble content on devices issued to students below ninth grade.

Handing smartphone­s to young children is part of the problem, Reber said, because many parents have no idea what their kids are doing online. One study found that 53% of American children own a smartphone by age 11.

“Know what your children are looking at,” Reber said. “Be careful if you’re going to give a device to your child because you’re handing them access to the world and to people that you don’t know. And would you do that normally? Would you open your door and let anybody come in? Because that’s what you’re doing.”

Both Reber and Hawkins emphasized that we shouldn’t blame parents for their children’s exposure to pornograph­y. They’re right – there’s no way to completely protect children.

As a nation, however, we need to do more to protect kids from sexually explicit and sexually violent content. Emulating France’s recent move would be a step in the right direction.

But parents are the first line of defense. Deciding at what age a child is ready for access to internet-connected devices (including smartphone­s), what content filters to use and ways to monitor internet use are critical issues that should be addressed for the safety of your children.

Otherwise, parents, and others entrusted with the care of a child, are left to hope that their kids will be the exception to the rule.

Without due vigilance, they won’t be. Theresa Olohan is an Opinion fellow on the USA TODAY Editorial Board and a recent graduate of the University of Notre Dame. Follow her on Twitter: @theresa_olohan

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States