Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Reports: Progress stalls on stop/frisk reforms

- Elliot Hughes

Three and half years in, a courtmanda­ted effort to overhaul the Milwaukee Police Department’s stopand-frisk practices “is not where we hoped it would be,” according to two recent reports from a nonprofit monitoring the effort.

The reports, released in March and April, show mixed results for a police department that is in the throes of a major culture change.

The reports found in the final six months of 2021, the department struggled to build off the progress it made in the first half of the year to ensure that officers are frisking civilians, and documentin­g those actions, in a constituti­onal manner.

They also repeated concerns from previous reports that the department’s Patrol Bureau is not matching other levels of command – such as administra­tors, trainers and inspection­s staff – in demonstrat­ing a commitment to achieving full compliance.

“It is worth recognizin­g that achieving full compliance requires a resetting of MPD’s culture and not only changes in actions and operations – a process that takes time,” the March report said.

The reports were written by the Boston-based Crime and Justice Institute, which has been tracking and publishing updates on the Police Department’s compliance with a $3.4 million settlement with the American Civil Liberties Union of Wisconsin over stop-and-frisk practices.

In its lawsuit, the ACLU argued that tens of thousands of Black and Latino Milwaukee residents had been stopped by police without reasonable suspicion of criminal activity for years. The settlement, reached in 2018, included a series of requiremen­ts for police to restructur­e how it stops and interacts with civilians, including how those interactio­ns are documented, how officers are supervised and how they’re discipline­d for infraction­s.

The reports released this spring include new data about police interactio­ns between July and December 2021. It shows the department has made continued progress in how officers conduct field interviews and traffic stops. But progress with frisks lagged.

“We’re taking this as serious as ever,” Nick DeSiato, the chief of staff for the Police Department, told a Fire and Police Commission committee Tuesday. “Chief (Jeffrey) Norman, this is one of his highest priorities, along with violent crime and reckless driving.

“We understand that it’s taken years to get to this point. It’s a challenge. The context and landscape currently going with crime in the city and reckless driving is relevant, it’s real, but it doesn’t mean that we can just

eschew our responsibi­lities here.”

The new 2021 data comes from a sampling of 379 police encounters, out of more than 24,600. Of the sampled encounters, Black civilians were involved in 57%, Hispanic/Latinos 18% and whites 17%.

The report measures how often officers documented the reasonable suspicion behind different kinds of police encounters, including traffic stops, frisks and field interviews. The settlement agreement requires police to document justification for at least 85% of its civilian encounters.

Here are some takeaways from the reports.

Stalled progress with frisks

Of all the police encounters, frisks represent the Police Department’s biggest challenge at reform. In six-month increments from January 2019 through December 2020, the department failed document justification for at least 79% of frisks.

Things improved with a score of 48.8% in the first half of 2021, but the April report showed no progress from there. The department failed to record justification for 53.6% of frisks in the second half of 2021.

Blacks are disproport­ionately represente­d among those who are frisked, accounting for 83.3% in the second half of 2021.

Of the department’s seven police districts, only three provided justification for more than half of frisks – Districts Four, Five and Seven. The other four provided justification for frisks between 29.4% and 37.5% of the time.

Reports by the Crime and Justice Institute also look for potential cases of undocument­ed frisks by examining body camera footage from a sample of incidents where a frisk or search was likely to have occurred, but was not documented. Those incidents include calls for a subject with a gun, shots fired, armed robbery or domestic violence battery, for example.

The April report looked at four such incidents and identified two undocument­ed frisks.

In total, stretching back to January 2019, the Crime and Justice Institute has examined 50 incidents and found 15 undocument­ed frisks.

What are the issues with frisks?

Officers are expected to provide two levels of justification for conducting a frisk: why officers thought the civilian has, is or will engage in a crime and why they think that person is armed and dangerous.

The April report pointed out two patterns in the department’s struggle with documentin­g frisks.

One is a tendency for officers to provide a lack of specific informatio­n about why the person is armed and dangerous. This includes nonspecific language, such as noticing a “bulge” in the person’s clothing, or they matched a descriptio­n of a suspect.

The other pattern is officers will attempt to justify the frisk by placing the civilian in the back seat of a squad car. The report explains that patting someone down before putting them in a squad car is valid, but oftentimes officers do not explain why a “back seat detention” is necessary.

Officers “may be using it as a reason to conduct a frisk when they do not otherwise have (reasons) to justify it,” the report said.

Whenever police find contraband during an unjustified frisk, any criminal prosecutio­n that might follow could be jeopardize­d. Out of 58 instances where contraband was discovered, the report noted that reasonable suspicion was documented for less than half of those frisks.

However, in general, the rate at which police found contraband during frisks has increased, from a low of 15.8% in the first half of 2020 to 30.2% in the second half of 2021.

The report suggested the higher “hit rate” might be a result of officers “making more discerning decisions about when to frisk individual­s during a police encounter.”

Solid track record with traffic stops continues

Of all the different types of police encounters measured by the Crime and Justice Institute’s reports, traffic stops have long been the Police Department’s strength. In the second half of 2021, police failed to record the reasonable suspicion behind an all-time low of 2.9% of traffic stops.

That marks two straight years the department has met the settlement agreement’s standards for documentin­g reasonable suspicion in traffic stops.

Field interviews see continued improvemen­t

The department nearly met the settlement agreement’s standards in this regard for the second half of 2021, with 17.3% of field interviews lacking justification.

With field interviews, the department has met the agreement’s standard once before, in the second half of 2019, with 8.5% going without justification. In the six months afterwards, it jumped back up to 48.6%.

Since then, the percentage of field interviews without justification has steadily decreased back down to 17.3%.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States