Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Wisconsin Supreme Court calls for responses to Planned Parenthood suit

- Jessie Opoien

MADISON — The state Supreme Court on Tuesday ordered parties named in a Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin lawsuit to file responses by April 26 — signaling the court may consider the organizati­on’s petition to recognize a constituti­onal right to bodily autonomy, including abortion.

The organizati­on argues the rights declared by the state Constituti­on — “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” — inherently include “the right to determine what one does with one’s own body, including whether and when to have a child.”

“All people in Wisconsin share that right equally,” the petition argues.

Planned Parenthood is also asking the court to recognize a right for physicians to provide abortions, arguing “life and liberty also require the right to pursue one’s lawful profession.”

The organizati­on filed the petition in February asking the state’s high court to take the case directly, because “these are exigent and urgent circumstan­ces that impact the health and well-being of the people we know and care about across the state,” said Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin chief strategy officer Michelle Velasquez.

The case was filed against District Attorneys Joel Urmanski, Ismael Ozanne and John Chisholm — who serve in the three Wisconsin counties (Sheboygan, Dane and Milwaukee) where abortions are provided.

Planned Parenthood’s filing came days after Urmanski filed a petition to bypass an appeals court and ask the state Supreme Court to consider a December ruling from a Dane County judge declaring an 1849 law outlawing abortion does not apply to consensual procedures.

If the court agrees to take that case, it’s likely it will side with the lower court’s ruling. The court now has a 4-3 liberal majority after Justice Janet Protasiewi­cz ran for a seat on the court with a campaign focused on restoring abortion access in Wisconsin.

Attorney General Josh Kaul and Gov. Tony Evers, both Democrats, filed that lawsuit shortly after the U.S. Supreme Court in June 2022 overturned its 1973 Roe v. Wade decision, which legalized abortion nationwide. The court’s 2022 ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Care effectively put back into place the state’s original abortion law.

Attorneys for Planned Parenthood argue that either before the court considers the challenge to the 1849 law, or at the same time, it should determine if an abortion ban violates the rights in the state Constituti­on “of persons who may become pregnant and of the physicians who provide care to them.”

“Even if Kaul v. Urmanski could be decided on statutory interpreta­tion, the constituti­onal issue is likely to recur,” the petition argues.

Wisconsin Right to Life legislativ­e director Gracie Skogman called the move “a radical action from Planned Parenthood, that demonstrat­es their disregard for human life.”

“The Wisconsin state Constituti­on protects the right to life for all, including preborn children,” Skogman said.

Chief Justice Annette Ziegler and Justice Rebecca Bradley dissented to the Tuesday order.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States