Modern Healthcare

It’s not over yet

Phoebe Putney restrained from integratin­g hospital

- Joe Carlson

Georgia’s Phoebe Putney Health System, which has gone to the U.S. Supreme Court and back in its quest to buy a rival hospital for $200 million, lost a key legal battle last week when a federal judge imposed what he called an “extraordin­ary and drastic” restrainin­g order on the union.

The Federal Trade Commission has waged a two-year legal battle against the health system, alleging that the acquisitio­n of the former Palmyra Medical Center in Albany, Ga., illegally gave Phoebe Putney monopoly power over hospital care in a sixcounty region. The 102-bed Palmyra became Phoebe’s fourth hospital in southwest Georgia in December 2011 when forprofit HCA sold it for $198 million.

U.S. District Judge W. Louis Sands granted a request for a temporary restrainin­g order that prevents Phoebe from integratin­g its new hospital into the system, including changing existing healthcare prices with managed-care companies. The ruling does not prevent Phoebe from striking new contracts with insurers that contain new prices. The FTC has said Phoebe gave insurers such as Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Georgia “substantia­lly” lower rates in exchange for agreements that the company would not contract with competitor­s such as Palmyra.

“Judge Sands made it clear that the TRO is limited entirely to preserving the status quo as it now exists and that this order is not intended to change the way Phoebe currently operates Phoebe North Campus, the former Palmyra Medical Center,” Tommy Chambless, Phoebe senior vice president and general counsel, said in an e-mailed statement. “This will have the effect of slowing some of the progress we have been moving toward, on Phoebe North Campus as well as on our main campus, and naturally, we will not yet be able to immediatel­y undertake our plans to develop a women’s and children’s center for our community,” Chambless said.

One factor that Sands considered in the restrainin­g-order request was the likelihood of an FTC victory that would unwind the transactio­n, based on initial arguments in a conference call with both sides. The restrainin­g order will remain in effect until Sands rules on the FTC’s related request for a preliminar­y injunction that would rely on more-detailed legal briefs and would stand until the case is resolved.

Despite the extensive litigation that has already occurred, little has been said about the central question of whether it was actually legal for Phoebe to buy its only crosstown rival for a price that critics held up as evidence that Phoebe was seeking a valuable monopoly.

Rather, Phoebe Putney defended the deal as immune from antitrust law because the legal entity that purchased Palmyra was a public agency known as the Hospital Authority of Albany-Dougherty County, which owns the Phoebe Putney hospitals and leases them to the system for $1 a year.

But in February, a unanimous Supreme Court ruled that the deal was not immune to FTC review.

That decision left the FTC and Phoebe to battle over the merits of the case in an FTC administra­tive hearing scheduled for August. But only a restrainin­g order from Sands, the FTC attorneys wrote, would prevent the hospitals from changing its prices in the meantime.

The FTC alleges that Phoebe hospitals, including Palmyra, control 86% of the market for hospital care in a six-county area, and that healthcare costs in Albany already far exceed prices in the rest of the state.

 ??  ?? A judge imposed a restrainin­g order on Phoebe Putney’s acquisitio­n of Palmyra.
A judge imposed a restrainin­g order on Phoebe Putney’s acquisitio­n of Palmyra.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States