Modern Healthcare

Insurers predict Medicare Advantage cuts even as CMS touts rate increase

- By Catherine Hollander —Catherine Hollander is a San Francisco-based freelance writer.

Insurers and Wall Street analysts foresee 2015 payment cuts for Medicare Advantage plans even as the Obama administra­tion, under intense industry lobbying, said last week that it planned to slightly boost rates.

On April 7, the CMS announced it would raise overall Advantage rates by 0.4% in 2015, reversing course from a February proposal the administra­tion said would have led to a 1.9% rate cut. Analysts had calculated that the preliminar­y policy would cut payments between 3% and 5%. Last week’s rate announceme­nt came as a surprise to most analysts, who had forecast a larger cut.

The positive change is the result of “various policy changes” and “new estimates,” said Jonathan Blum, CMS’ principal deputy administra­tor. These include the administra­tion’s approach to phasing in a new risk model and a decision to walk away from a proposal to require that home-risk assessment­s be confirmed by in-office assessment­s.

Ana Gupte, an analyst at Leerink Partners, called the revised policy “an improvemen­t relative to the preliminar­y rate,” but said she still believed overall rates would fall by roughly 3% next year. UBS analysts also said they expected 2015 rates to fall by 3%.

The move may give congressio­nal Democrats some political cover with senior voters against GOP attacks in the November elections. America’s Health Insurance Plans has led a major lobbying and advertisin­g drive to keep the administra­tion from cutting the rates. The industry notched at least one significan­t victory with the administra­tion’s decision to delay a plan to exclude diagnosis codes derived from home-risk assessment­s, which J.P. Morgan analysts estimated would have cut rates by an additional 2%.

The American Hospital Associatio­n and other provider organizati­ons also lobbied hard against the home-risk assessment methodolog­y, said Sheryl Skolnick, managing director and senior healthcare analyst at CRT Capital Group.

“The administra­tion is starting off at a lower baseline that no one seems to be able to come up with.”

— Ana Gupte Analyst Leerink Partners

Some analysts saw politics in the CMS’ rate announceme­nt. “I’m very suspicious about how you get from their estimate of down 1.9 to plus (0.4%), when it just so happens to be exactly the kind of overall rate change that the Democrats need to support their election hopes,” Skolnick said.

The impact of CMS’ decision on Medicare Advantage plans will vary depending on the plan and where it’s located. But overall, insurers, who depend on Advantage plans for a growing share of their revenue and profits, said they will see a decline. “The changes CMS included in the final rate notice will help mitigate the impact on seniors, but the Medicare Advantage program is still facing a reduction in payment rates next year on top of the 6% cut to payments in 2014,” AHIP President and CEO Karen Ignagni said in a written statement.

Humana, one of the major players in Medicare Advantage, estimated that rates will drop roughly 3% for 2015, based on a preliminar­y review of last week’s notice, according to its filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Cigna estimated a 3% cut “when factoring in CMS changes with the Affordable Care Act and other industry fees set to take effect in 2015,” it said in a written statement.

A CMS spokesman declined to comment on the calculatio­ns from insurers and Wall Street.

Analysts cautioned that teasing out precisely how the government calculates its numbers is a difficult task, but offered some possible explanatio­ns.

“The administra­tion is starting off at a lower baseline that no one seems to be able to come up with,” said Leerink’s Gupte.

The impact of policy changes the administra­tion made between February and the announceme­nt this week—about 2.5 percentage points—seems to be in line with Wall Street estimates, Gupte said. It’s just that the administra­tion is starting from a much higher figure.

In other words, if you add the 2.5 percentage points to the -5.5% that some analysts believed was the baseline in the CMS policy proposed in February, you still end up in negative territory. But if you add the same changes to a -1.9% baseline, you end up with a rate increase, which is how the CMS presented its calculatio­ns last week.

Another analyst noted the way the administra­tion is calculatin­g risk adjustment­s as the source of the discrepanc­y. The CMS is calculatin­g an additional benefit of 3.9% attributed to “other risk adjustment updates” that Wall Street doesn’t recognize, said Chris Rigg, a healthcare analyst at Susquehann­a Financial Group.

More than 15 million seniors are enrolled in Medicare Advantage plans, or nearly 30% of the total Medicare population. Insurance companies must submit bids for next year’s plans to the CMS by June 2.

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act sought to bring the cost of Advantage plans more closely in line with traditiona­l Medicare. But Medicare currently spends significan­tly more on Advantage enrollees than on traditiona­l Medicare beneficiar­ies.

“The changes underway revise payments to Medicare Advantage plans to be more consistent with costs in traditiona­l Medicare, while incentiviz­ing quality improvemen­ts by basing part of Advantage payment on plan quality performanc­e,” the CMS said in a fact sheet.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States