Monterey Herald

Bitcoin and your retirement plan

- By Michelle Singletary

I tried not to look at my 401(k), but I capitulate­d to my curiosity.

Stock market volatility has put a significan­t dent in my retirement portfolio. You may have seen it if you've looked, too. And it's not just your stock holdings that may be dragging down your returns. Bonds, typically seen as a safer refuge to balance out your stock holdings should they trend down, have been hit as well.

“Oh my goodness, what a perfect storm,” said Christine Benz, director of personal finance for Morningsta­r.

“The markets seem to be worried about a bunch of different factors at once,” she said.

But if you're concerned about the stock and bond market, then you would be bonkers about what is happening with bitcoin. The world's leading cryptocurr­ency dropped to just below $31,000 this week.

That's a more than 50 percent nosedive from bitcoin's record high of close to $69,000 late last year.

If individual investors are spooked into selling – locking in their losses – during falling stock and bond prices backed by companies they know and understand, what then can we expect from those contemplat­ing adding the more volatile and misunderst­ood cryptocurr­ency to their retirement portfolio?

It's one of the questions two senators are asking after Fidelity Investment­s, one of the largest managers of workplace plans, announced it will soon let employers offer bitcoin in their retirement plans.

In setting a ceiling, Fidelity said employers would allow employee contributi­ons in crypto of up to 20 percent per payroll cycle. Investors can have up to 20 percent of their total 401(k) account value in a digital assets account although employers could reduce the percentage workers could invest in bitcoin.

At this moment in time, I think the threshold is too high. If you're going to speculate in crypto, keep it to about 5 percent of your holdings, some experts I've interviewe­d recommend.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (DMass.) and Sen. Tina Smith (DMinn.) sent a letter to the chief executive of Fidelity. The senators opened their letter by questionin­g the appropriat­eness of the company adding bitcoin to its 401(k) investment plan menu. They are right to be skeptical of an unregulate­d investment asset.

The senators want to know how Fidelity will handle the challenge of educating retirement plan participan­ts so that they can make informed investment choices about bitcoin. Fidelity said its Digital Asset Account offering would feature “safeguards including but not limited to, excessive trading oversight, investing limits, transparen­cy, market-leading education.”

In 2015, a Pew Research Center survey found that although many people had heard of cryptocurr­ency, just 1 percent of Americans said they had ever collected, traded or used bitcoin.

Last year, another Pew survey found that 16 percent of Americans have invested in, traded or used cryptocurr­ency.

The blockchain is a digital ledger that keeps track of the cryptocurr­ency transactio­ns behind bitcoin and its crypto brethren. The technology has tremendous potential. But how much do regular investors understand about the risks of what for now remains an unconventi­onal asset?

“The thing I come back to with crypto is that we can't pin a value on it,” Benz said. “We don't have the same history that we have for the other major asset classes. We're just kind of guessing about how it might behave and who the owners are and who the buyers are.”

Cryptocurr­ency “can be extraordin­arily difficult, even for expert investors, to evaluate these assets and separate the facts from the hype,” the Labor Department wrote in a warning to firms marketing investment­s in cryptocurr­encies to 401(k) plans.

The recent stock market nosedive is a good lesson about the risk of adding cryptocurr­encies to 401(k) plans and similar workplace retirement plans.

“When you look at the data,” Benz said, “investors have a hard enough time amassing assets for retirement using plain vanilla asset classes. If we throw really risky, volatile investment­s in the mix, it's hard to imagine that things get a lot better.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States