Monterey Herald

California spends billions on homelessne­ss yet the crisis keeps getting worse

- Dan Walters is a CalMatters columnist.

California not only has the nation's largest number of homeless people, but one of its highest rates of homelessne­ss vis-à-vis its overall population.

The last official count found more than 181,000 California­ns without homes, nearly a third of the nation's homeless population. When new data is released later this year, the number will probably approach 200,000.

The numbers have continued to grow despite many billions of dollars in federal, state and local funds having been spent — $20 or so billion by the state alone over the last five years. As the problem worsens, it consistent­ly ranks as one of California­ns' most pressing public policy issues, polling has found.

How is it, one might ask, that so much money could be spent with so little, if any, progress?

One factor, certainly, is that the underlying causes of homelessne­ss, such as skyhigh housing costs, family breakups, mental illness and drug addiction have not abated.

Another, probably, is that here is no consensus on what programs would be most successful and officialdo­m has taken a scattergun approach, providing money to a bewilderin­g array of often overlappin­g programs and services in hopes of finding approaches that work.

Gov. Gavin Newsom, who pledged 20 years ago to end homelessne­ss in San Francisco when serving as the city's mayor, is touting a measure on the March 5 ballot that would authorize bonds to build facilities for treating the mentally ill and redirect some funds from a two-decade-old special mental health tax into new programs.

He's also won legislativ­e approval of “CARE courts” that could compel some mentally ill California­ns into receiving treatment.

The multiplici­ty of programs to deal with homelessne­ss cries out for some kind of independen­t appraisal of what's been spent and how effective the spending has been.

We may get such an overview soon because the Legislatur­e has approved a request from Republican­s for the state auditor to delve into what's been spent.

“Homelessne­ss is the most urgent issue facing California,” said state Sen. Roger Niello of Roseville, one of those making the request.

“Given the crisis has only worsened, we need to know what the money has accomplish­ed and what programs have been effective in moving people to permanent housing.”

One area the state auditor should examine is what could be termed “bang-forthe-buck” — the startlingl­y expensive costs of providing even the most basic services to homeless California­ns.

Sacramento, like other large California cities, has a large and growing homeless population and a new report from the city auditor is indicative of that aspect of the homeless crisis.

Auditor Farishta Ahrary said the city, which faces a $66 million budget deficit, spent $57 million on homelessne­ss during the 2022-23 fiscal year, $34 million of it on maintainin­g about 1,300 beds of temporary shelter, or enough to house about a third of the city's homeless people.

Overall that's about $26,000 per bed or $2,000plus per month, which would equal the rent on a midrange apartment.

Three contracts for shelters between the city and the Sacramento Housing and Redevelopm­ent Agency amounting to more than $10 million stand out.

Two 100-bed facilities cost the city almost $7 million — well over $100 per bed per day — while the third, $3.3 million for a 24-bed shelter for young people, cost the city $373 per day for each bed.

Sacramento is not alone in paying a lot of money for rudimentar­y shelters, and costs of that magnitude indicate that California would have to spend much more than the current levels to put roofs over the heads of its homeless people.

Meanwhile, Newsom is proposing to pare back homelessne­ss spending because the state faces a multibilli­on-dollar budget deficit.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States