Morning Sun

It’s time to entertain the possibilit­y that the Build Back Better bill won’t pass

- Henry Olsen is a Washington Post columnist and a senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center.

Most pundits seem to be operating under the assumption that President Joe Biden’s Build Back Better program will eventually become law. After all, it would be very unusual for a Congress controlled by the president’s party to reject his first major domestic proposal.

But given developmen­ts in the past week, it might be time to start seriously considerin­g the chance that BBB is DOA.

Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., has long been the primary obstacle to BBB’S passage. He represents an energy-producing state, so he has a different view on the bill’s climate provisions than most Democrats. West Virginia also is now staunchly Republican at all levels and voted for former president Donald Trump by 39 points in 2020. To have any hope of re-election, Manchin has to show his constituen­ts that he is fighting hard for them.

His comments at a Wall Street Journal online event show how hard it will be for him to agree to anything that the rest of his party will back. He complained that House Democrats had shrunk the cost of the bill primarily by creating artificial expiration dates for the host of programs they have crammed into the package.

And he noted that Congress has rarely adhered to dates like these in the past, saying, “If we keep sending checks, it will be hard to stop the checks.” He reiterated those thoughts Monday, telling reporters that “whatever plan it will be” should be done for 10 years without potentiall­y artificial expiration dates.

Manchin also continued to emphasize the risk that inflation plays in his calculus. He noted that the average West Virginian drives 50 miles a day for work, making inflation particular­ly problemati­c for his constituen­ts. And he complained that Congress had already appropriat­ed $5.4 trillion this year between the American Rescue Plan and the Infrastruc­ture Investment and Jobs Act, more than what was spent in inflation-adjusted dollars for World War II and the Marshall Plan combined. Yet, “no one wants to stop and take a breath,” Manchin said. He, for one, clearly wants to take a deep breath.

His concerns were documented by last week’s Congressio­nal Budget Office analysis, which showed BBB’S cost would rise dramatical­ly if major programs included did not expire on schedule. The CBO analysis showed that if Manchin’s fears were realized and the BBB programs were effectivel­y made permanent, those extensions would add $3 trillion to the nation’s deficit over the next decade. Those numbers were “very sobering,” he said on Monday.

It’s theoretica­lly easy to meet Manchin’s bottom line by stripping most of the items out of the bill and focusing on one or two large programs. Advocates are pushing hard to make the expanded child tax credits permanent before the month end, when the current credit expires. That may be attractive to Manchin, but doing so would add nearly $1.6 trillion to the deficit over 10 years. That’s more than the entire amount of new revenue the CBO estimated in November that BBB’S tax hikes would raise.

It would also run afoul of what the bulk of Democrats want from the bill. Progressiv­es have clearly stated all year that they expect a transforma­tional package. That means going as far as possible on a host of issues at once, which is why BBB expands the child tax credit and creates universal pre-k and expands Obamacare subsidies and many other things. They have been willing to compromise thus far primarily on the overall cost, which is why the bill that passed the House has so many programmat­ic expiration­s. They have not been willing to admit that there isn’t a Senate majority for a transforma­tional bill. Instead, they have been ramping up the pressure on Manchin to go along with the party majority.

That’s not something Manchin is willing to do, per all his public statements. He said last week that “this is not the best job I’ve ever had . . . I’m not going to sell my soul for this.” He said he was “not a Washington Democrat,” and implied that he would leave the Democratic caucus if asked. For him to cave now would require a massive act of self-abasement that would almost surely end his long political career.

Democrats thus face the specter of progressiv­es’ irresistib­le force meeting Manchin’s immovable object. That clash looks increasing­ly likely, and the resultant explosion could easily blow up BBB along with it.

 ?? ?? Henry Olsen
Henry Olsen

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States