Morning Sun

Document Prince Andrew claims prevents lawsuit is released

- By Larry Neumeister

NEW YORK » A woman who says she was sexually trafficked to Britain’s Prince Andrew by Jeffrey Epstein accepted $500,000 in 2009 to settle her lawsuit against the American millionair­e and anyone else “who could have been included as a potential defendant,” according to a court record unsealed Monday.

The prince’s lawyers say that language should bar Virginia Giuffre from suing Andrew now, even though he wasn’t a party to the original settlement.

The private 2009 legal deal resolved Giuffre’s allegation­s that Epstein had hired her as a teenager to be a sexual servant at his estate in Palm Beach, Florida.

Andrew was not named in that lawsuit, but Giuffre had alleged in it that Epstein had flown her around the world for sexual encounters with numerous men “including royalty, politician­s, academicia­ns, businessme­n and/or profession­al and personal acquaintan­ces.”

The settlement unsealed Monday also doesn’t mention Andrew, but contains a single paragraph saying it protects anyone “who could have been included as a potential defendant” from being sued by Giuffre.

Attorney Andrew Brettler, representi­ng the prince, has told a Manhattan federal court judge that the agreement should release Andrew “from any purported liability.”

Attorney David Boies, who represents Giuffre, said in a statement Monday that the language about protecting potential defendants in the settlement between his client and Epstein was “irrelevant” to the prince’s lawsuit in part because the paragraph did not mention the prince and he didn’t know about it.

“He could not have been a ‘potential defendant’ in the settled case against Jeffrey Epstein both because he was not subject to jurisdicti­on in Florida and because the Florida case involved federal claims to which he was not a part,” Boies said.

Boies said he wanted the Epstein-giuffre agreement publicly released “to refute the claims being made about it by Prince Andrew’s” public relations campaign.

Giuffre sued the prince in August, saying he had sexually assaulted her multiple times in 2001 when she was 17.

The prince’s lawyers say Andrew never sexually abused or assaulted Giuffre and that he “unequivoca­lly denies Giuffre’s false allegation­s against him.”

They also wrote that Giuffre sued Andrew “to achieve another payday at his expense and at the expense of those closest to him. Epstein’s abuse of Giuffre does not justify her public campaign against Prince Andrew.”

Arguments over the request to dismiss the lawsuit are scheduled for Tuesday.

Recently, the prince’s lawyers have said Giuffre should be disallowed from suing in the U.S. because she has lived most of the past two decades in Australia and can’t accurately claim to be a resident of Colorado, where her mother lives.

Judge Lewis A. Kaplan has rejected an attempt by the lawyers to halt progressio­n of the lawsuit and to subject Giuffre to a deposition over the issue of where she is a resident.

In late 2019, Prince Andrew told BBC Newsnight that he never had sex with Giuffre, saying, “It didn’t happen.”

He said he has “no recollecti­on” of ever meeting her.

The interview was widely panned by critics who said Andrew seemed insensitiv­e to Epstein’s victims. Afterward, the prince stepped back from royal duties.

A message seeking comment was left with a spokespers­on for Giuffre’s lawyers and with Brettler.

The Associated Press does not typically identify people who say they are victims of sexual assault unless they choose to come forward publicly, as Giuffre has done.

 ?? ASSOCIATED PRESS FILE PHOTO ?? A lawsuit by an American who claims Prince Andrew, pictured above, sexually abused her when she was 17might have to be thrown out because she no longer lives in the U.S., lawyers for the Prince said in a court filing on Dec. 28.
ASSOCIATED PRESS FILE PHOTO A lawsuit by an American who claims Prince Andrew, pictured above, sexually abused her when she was 17might have to be thrown out because she no longer lives in the U.S., lawyers for the Prince said in a court filing on Dec. 28.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States