Morning Sun

Arizona expects to be back target of election attacks

- By Ali Swenson

The room sits behind a chain-link fence, then black iron gates. Guards block the entrance, which requires a security badge to access. The glass surroundin­g it is shatterpro­of.

What merits all these layers of protection is somewhat surprising: tabulating machines that count votes in Arizona’s Maricopa County. The security measures are a necessary expense, said the county’s recorder, Stephen Richer, as Arizona and its largest county have become hotbeds of election misinforma­tion that drives harassment toward election workers.

“What would be even more of a shame is if we couldn’t look the workers in the eye and say we’re doing everything possible to make sure that you’re safe,” he said.

Richer’s job is to oversee voter registrati­on and early voting, but much of his time has been diverted to preparing for disinforma­tion and its consequenc­es. The state’s razor-thin presidenti­al outcome in 2020 made it a national epicenter for conspiracy theories about voter fraud and phony results.

The false claims promoted by prominent Republican candidates have driven protesters to rally outside vote-counting centers and to patrol drop boxes. They have led to death threats against election workers and their families and prompted top election officials to quit.

Election meddlers have also attempted to hack the state’s electronic systems, Secretary of State Adrian Fontes said.

The challenges come as understaff­ed and underfunde­d election offices nationwide are dealing with persistent misinforma­tion and harassment of election workers, artificial intelligen­ce deepfakes, potential cyberattac­ks from foreign government­s and criminal ransomware attacks.

With looming elections this fall, Republican Richer and Democrat Fontes are taking more aggressive steps than ever to rebuild trust with Arizona voters, knock down disinforma­tion and immediatel­y address threats.

They said they are hoping it’s enough to counter an onslaught they know is coming in November.

Fontes, a Marine Corps veteran, has brought his military mindset to the office since he started last year. He has deployed “tiger teams” to troublesho­ot problems and hosted simulation­s on Ai-generated disinforma­tion.

He also created a four-person informatio­n security team. One member is solely devoted to monitoring the internet for election-related disinforma­tion and threats.

Conservati­ves in other states have balked at their election offices partnering with companies to track online postings, arguing it enables government surveillan­ce and censorship. Arizonans voting before last Tuesday’s presidenti­al primary in the Phoenix suburb of Tempe also weren’t convinced.

“You’re monitoring it for threats? Sure. You need to ensure safety,” said 40-year-old Thomas Abia. But he called monitoring for falsehoods a “gray area.”

Fontes defends the need for the dedicated staffer, whose name he declined to share to protect that person’s safety.

“Yeah, we are surveillin­g a certain group,” he said. “We’re surveillin­g people that want to destroy our democracy. And that’s not political.”

The team’s leader, chief informatio­n security officer Michael Moore, used to do similar work for Maricopa County, which includes Phoenix. He said after seeing threats that disrupted workers’ lives, he believes those who spread misinforma­tion are responsibl­e.

“Sophistica­ted snake oil salesmen are telling people what they want to hear in the election conspiracy vein — and that emboldens people to take action,” Moore said.

Fontes and Richer agree that rebuilding public trust will require transparen­cy.

Fontes is testing a statewide system for voters to receive text messages when their ballot is mailed, delivered, returned and counted. Richer recently hosted his first “Ask Me Anything” live video session on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter.

Misinforma­tion has created doubt among many voters.

Jane Carter, a 62-yearold property manager, is one of them. A Republican, she said she doesn’t have faith in election officials.

“I don’t have a lot of confidence in anybody that’s doing anything, really,” she said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States