CORONAVIRUS IS CHINESE BIOWEAPON!
■ Wuhan whistleblowers jailed & MURDERED! ■ Lab’s research papers SHREDDED! ■ Was America targeted for ATTACK?
PLAGUE WAS BORN AT LAB – NOT MEAT MARKET – SAY EXPERTS
THE coronavirus was deliberately engineered as a bioweapon in a Chinese lab! That’s the bombshell claim of a criminal complaint filed by former U.S. Justice Department prosecutor Larry Klayman at the International Criminal Court in The Hague, Netherlands! He’s also filed a lawsuit against the People’s Republic of China, its president, Xi Jinping, and other government officials seeking trillions of dollars in damages, The National ENQUIRER has learned. It comes as COVID-19 has infected more than 2.6 million people worldwide and claimed the lives of over 183,000 as it brought economies around the world to a near standstill. In the U.S., more than 50,000 people have died of the dreaded disease and it’s infected more than 1 million Americans. The blockbuster lawsuit calls for an inquiry into “the likely creation and release, accidental or otherwise, of a variation of coronavirus known as COVID-19 … as a biological weapon.” The lawsuit adds China planned to use “such weapons against its perceived enemies, including but not limited to the people of the United States," The Chinese government has denied claims the virus came from a lab - sticking to official narrative that it was transferred to humans from a bat sold as food at a “wet” market in the city of Wuhan.
Yuan Zhiming, the director of the Wuhan National Biosafety Laboratory, told China Global Television Network: “There is absolutely no way that the virus originated from our institute.” Despite that, a growing number of politicians, scientists and experts have become increasingly suspicious about the government-operated Wuhan Institute of Virology. Designated an extreme isolation security BSL-4 lab, it’s located just eight miles from the “wet” market and its scientists have been studying coronaviruses in bats.
In 2018 a U.S. government inspection team reported serious violations there, including a warning that the lab’s work showed a risk of a new pandemic.
Their concerns are echoed
by Dr. Francis Boyle, a professor of international law at the University of Illinois College of Law, who drafted the U.S. Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989. During a discussion on the “Geopolitics and Empire” podcast, Dr. Boyle said he believes Chinese labs used “DNA genetic engineering” to create COVID-19. “BSL-4 labs are used to develop all kinds of biological warfare agents,” he said. “There is really no legitimate scientific reason to have BSL-4 labs.”
Top scientists have disputed Dr. Boyle’s claims, insisting BSL-4 labs are mostly used to produce vaccines.
They also pointed out the Wuhan lab receives funding from the U.S. National Institutes of Health and has been conducting research on bat viruses for years.
The World Health Organization said evidence indicated the disease originated in an animal, but it was still working to understand how it transferred to humans. In published work,
Ohio State University researchers said there is “no credible evidence” of genetic engineering in the virus.
Despite that, the prestigious medical journal The Lancet reported in January the first known cases of the virus had no contact with the
Wuhan market.
Safety concerns at the Wuhan Institute of Virology
have also been raised. A photograph obtained by The ENQUIRER reportedly shows a faulty seal on the door of a refrigerator holding deadly virus strains. The picture was originally posted by Chinese state media but removed when the safety lapse was pointed out.
What’s more, a number of whistleblowers who raised alarms about the virus were censored or even jailed.
Dr. Li Wenliang was silenced by police after warning students about the virus. He later died of COVID-19.
Law professor Xu Zhangrun was placed under house arrest and cut off from the internet after speaking out about the government’s handling of the virus. There are reports other whistleblowers were murdered to bury the truth behind the pandemic. In January, U.S. Sen.
Tom Cotton of Arkansas noted China’s “deceit and dishonesty” when telling the world about the virus and cited “the extreme draconian measures taken” to contain it showed just how serious it really was.
“By the third week of January, they had more than 75 million people on lockdown,” he told NationalReview.com. At the same time, the Chinese government went to great lengths to cover its tracks.
In January it posted its top virologist to Wuhan, shredded documents from the Wuhan lab and destroyed hundreds of incriminating samples, investigators have claimed.
Florida-based attorney Matthew Moore, who filed a class-action suit against the Chinese government in March, told The ENQUIRER, “A postgrad researcher called Huang Yanling was aligned with [the Wuhan lab] and had been publishing papers since 2013 on her study of the coronavirus and of the horseshoe bat. “She has been pointed to as a possible patient zero but has now disappeared from all records even though she had an internship and then a job at the lab — and no one knows where she is.” But her fate is one of many mysteries surrounded the outbreak — including China’s next move.
With its own people on lockdown, China’s government acted to turn a massive profit by selling vital equipment when America and Europe were hit, White House Office of Trade and Manufacturing Policy director Peter Navarro told FOX News. He isn’t alone in his suspicions.
Top terror expert Dr. Jim Garrow told The ENQUIRER: “They loaded infected people on planes and sent them to America. It wasn’t solely to kill lots of people. It was designed to create economic havoc — and it worked very well.”
With authorities worldwide demanding a thorough investigation into China and the Wuhan lab, Sen. Cotton wrote in The Wall Street Journal: “This evidence is circumstantial, to be sure, but it all points toward the Wuhan labs.
“Thanks to the Chinese cover-up, we may never have direct, conclusive evidence … but Americans justifiably can use common sense to follow the logic of events to their likely conclusion.”