New Haven Register (New Haven, CT)

Indictment accuses Moscow of election meddling

-

Twelve Russian military intelligen­ce officers hacked into the Clinton presidenti­al campaign and Democratic Party and released tens of thousands of private communicat­ions in a sweeping conspiracy by the Kremlin to meddle in the 2016 U.S. election, according to an indictment announced days before President Donald Trump’s summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin.

The indictment represents special counsel Robert Mueller’s first charges against Russian government officials for interferin­g in American politics, an effort U.S. intelligen­ce agencies say was aimed at helping the Trump campaign and harming Democratic opponent, Hillary Clinton. The case follows after a separate indictment that accused Russians of using social media to sow discord among American voters two years ago.

The 29-page indictment lays out how, months before Americans went to the polls, Russian officers schemed to break into key Democratic email accounts, including those belonging to Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta, the Democratic National Committee and the Democratic Congressio­nal Campaign Committee. Stolen emails, many politicall­y damaging for Clinton, appeared on WikiLeaks in the campaign’s final stretch.

The charges allege the Russian defendants, using a persona known as Guccifer 2.0, in August 2016 contacted a person who was in touch with the Trump campaign to offer help. And they say that on the same day Trump said in a speech, “Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing,” Russian hackers tried for the first time to break into email accounts used by Clinton’s personal office.

Mueller did not allege that Trump campaign associates were involved in the hacking effort or that Americans were knowingly in touch with Russian intelligen­ce officers, and the indictment does not allege that any vote tallies were altered by hacking. The White House seized on those points in a statement that offered no condemnati­on of the alleged Russian conspiracy.

It was unclear whether the indictment might factor into Trump’s meeting with Putin on Monday. He has repeatedly expressed skepticism about Russian involvemen­t in the hacking and has been accused by Democrats of cozying up to the Russian president. Trump complained about the Russia investigat­ion before the indictment, saying the “stupidity” was making it “very hard to do something with Russia.”

The Kremlin, meanwhile, denied anew that it tried to sway the election. “The Russian state has never interfered and has no intention of interferin­g in the U.S. elections,” Putin’s foreign affairs adviser, Yuri Ushakov, said Friday.

The indictment identifies the defendants as officers with Russia’s Main Intelligen­ce Directorat­e of the General Staff, also known as GRU. If that link is establishe­d, it would shatter the Kremlin denials of the Russian state’s involvemen­t in the U.S. elections given that the GRU is part of the state machine.

The Russian defendants are not in custody, and it is not clear they will ever appear in American court, though the Justice Department has recently seen value in indicting foreign hackers in absentia as public deterrence.

The indictment accuses the Russian hackers, starting in March 2016, of covertly monitoring the computers of dozens of Democratic officials and volunteers, implanting malicious computer code known as malware to explore the networks and steal data and of phishing emails to gain access to accounts.

One attempt at interferen­ce noted in the indictment came hours after Trump, in a July 27, 2016, speech, suggested Russians look for emails that Clinton said she had deleted from her tenure as secretary of state.

“Russia, if you’re listening,” Trump said, “I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing.”

That evening, the indictment says, the Russians attempted to break into email accounts used by Clinton’s personal office, along with 76 Clinton campaign email addresses.

By June 2016, the defendants, relying on fictional personas like DCLeaks and Guccifer 2.0, began planning the release of tens of thousands of stolen emails and documents, the indictment alleges.

The hack displayed the private communicat­ions of the campaign in harmful ways, including deliberati­ons about messaging that played into attacks that Clinton was calculatin­g and a political flip-flopper. Private speeches she gave to financial industry firms were particular­ly damaging within the left wing of the Democratic party and among independen­ts frustrated with the influence of Wall Street in politics.

The indictment alleges that Guccifer 2.0 was in touch with multiple Americans about the pilfered material, including an unidentifi­ed congressio­nal candidate who requested and then received stolen informatio­n

On Aug. 15, 2016, the indictment says, Guccifer 2.0 reached out to someone in regular contact with the Trump campaign and asked the person if he or she had seen anything “interestin­g in the docs I posted?” Guccifer 2.0 offered help and said it would be a “great pleasure.”

The indictment doesn’t identify the person, though longtime Trump confidant Roger Stone acknowledg­ed through his lawyer Friday a “24-word exchange with someone on Twitter claiming to be Guccifer 2.0.”

“This exchange is now entirely public and provides no evidence of collaborat­ion or collusion with Guccifer 2.0 or anyone else in the alleged hacking of the DNC emails,” said lawyer Grant Smith.

In addition, someone at Wikileaks contacted Guccifer 2.0 weeks before the Democratic National Convention asking for material on Clinton in advance, to prevent her from solidifyin­g support from rival Sen. Bernie Sanders, court papers show.

The charges come as Mueller continues to investigat­e potential coordinati­on between Russia and the Trump campaign to influence the election.

Before Friday, 20 people and three companies had been charged in the Mueller investigat­ion. Defendants include four former Trump campaign and White House aides, three of whom have pleaded guilty and agreed to cooperate, and 13 Russians accused of participat­ing in a hidden but powerful social media campaign to sway U.S. public opinion in 2016.

Trump’s lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, said on Twitter that it was time to end the Mueller investigat­ion since “no Americans are involved” in Friday’s indictment. But with Mueller still investigat­ing, it’s not known whether further indictment­s are taking shape or will.

At the Justice Department, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein called for a unified approach to foreign meddling.

“When we confront foreign interferen­ce in American elections, it is important for us to avoid thinking politicall­y as Republican­s or Democrats and instead to think patriotica­lly as Americans,” he said. “Our response must not depend on who was victimized.”

The Trump-Putin meeting is scheduled for Monday in Finland.

Top Senate Democrat Chuck Schumer urged Trump to cancel the meeting until Russia takes steps to prove it won’t interfere in future elections. He said the indictment­s are “further proof of what everyone but the president seems to understand: President Putin is an adversary who interfered in our elections to help President Trump win.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States