New Haven Register (New Haven, CT)

No income-tax hike on rich in tentative budget

- By Keith M. Phaneuf and Mark Pazniokas CTMIRROR.ORG

Gov. Ned Lamont’s administra­tion and legislativ­e leaders closed in Friday on a budget deal that would create a new “mansion tax,” but exclude the income-tax increase on the rich sought by rank-and-file Democrats.

Sources close to the negotiatio­ns said the package features an additional property tax on expensive homes and higher taxes on pass-through entity businesses. Combined, these would generate less than one-quarter of the revenue available from the income-tax increase favored by progressiv­e Democrats, an extra 2-percent levy on capital gains earned by couples with million-dollar incomes and single filers making $500,000.

Lamont said Friday after an early Memorial Day event that he hoped a deal would be finalized soon after the holiday, allowing a vote before the constituti­onal adjournmen­t deadline of midnight June 5.

“The number one promise I made to people is that I’m going to do everything I can within my power to get you an honestly balanced budget on time,” Lamont said. “I think we’re very close, but as people point out to me, the first 95 yards of the football field are as tough as the final five yards. We’re five yards to go, and I think we’re going to get there.”

The progressiv­ity of the tax structure and the degree to which state services would be cut to balance the budget have been a constant source of tension between legislativ­e Democrats and the Democratic governor, a Greenwich businessma­n endorsed by the Connecticu­t AFLCIO and labor’s liberal offshoot, the Working Families Party.

Lamont has stressed fiscal stability over all else, shying from taxes on the rich that tend to be volatile and resisting efforts to ease spending cuts by tapping into a suddenly flush budget reserve, which the governor says must be banked as a hedge against another recession.

For the tentative deal, Lamont has dropped his proposals to tax sweetened beverages and to force towns to pay a portion of teacher pension costs. And the governor’s plan to eliminate dozens of sales tax exemptions was scaled back considerab­ly.

To balance the numbers, though, the framework defers property tax relief for middleclas­s households without children. It features a 10-cent fee on plastic bags and new levies on vaping products.

Cities and towns were supposed to receive about $66 million annually by 2021 from a new one percent sales-tax surcharge on restaurant meals and other prepared foods. The tax would go forward, sources said, but the revenue would stay in the state’s coffers.

And Connecticu­t’s hospitals, as expected, will not receive the big tax cut pledged by the last legislatur­e. The framework maintains the current tax rate on hospitals.

Avoiding fourth income tax hike in 10 years

The state is currently running a surplus, but tax and fee hikes of all kinds have been discussed this year because analysts project state finances, unless adjusted, are on pace to run more than $3 billion in deficit over the next two fiscal years combined.

But Lamont pledged during his campaign not to raise income tax rates and has said frequently that doing so would jeopardize Connecticu­t’s growing economy. Legislator­s raised income tax rates in 2009, 2011 and 2015, and also have significan­tly reduced the property tax credit over the past eight years.

The governor has called targeting Connecticu­t’s wealthiest a “really bad idea” and predicted it would cause them to leave the state, costing the state tax revenue.

“The governor doesn’t want to raise the income tax on anyone within any income bracket and has repeated this over and over,” said Maribel La Luz, the governor’s communicat­ions director.

But many of the governor’s fellow Democrats in the House and Senate majorities disagree.

“Our state relies heavily on regressive sales and property taxes while employing a moderately progressiv­e income tax,” fifty-six representa­tives and seven senators wrote Thursday to the governor. They urged him to back a Finance Revenue and Bonding Committee plan to tax capital gains by filers in the top bracket at 8.99 percent. Capital gains are currently taxed the same as other income, with a top rate of 6.99 percent.

According to a 2018 report from nonpartisa­n fiscal analysts, a Connecticu­t household earning $96,000 per year generates less than 10 percent of its income from investment­s or other earnings that much be reported quarterly. But for a household making more than $2 million per year, the average share of earnings from investment­s approaches 79 percent.

The committee estimated this would generate $262 million per year. And progressiv­es said most of the tax increases Lamont proposed would fall most heavily on middle- or low-income households. Capital gains tax is out, mansion tax is in

Sources said administra­tion officials and legislativ­e leaders instead agreed to reduce a tax credit claimed by pass-through entities — limited liability corporatio­ns and other businesses that don’t pay the state corporatio­n tax. Instead their earnings are distribute­d through principal owners who are taxed through their personal income tax.

The tentative framework also includes the so-called “mansion tax,” a statewide property tax of 1 mill on houses valued at more than $2.5 million.

But these initiative­s generate roughly $53 million and $5 million, respective­ly. Together that’s less than one-fourth of the amount generated by the capital gains surcharge proposal.

Rep. Josh Elliott, D-Hamden, a member of the House Democratic Progressiv­e Caucus, said leaders should not to underestim­ate the resolve of ran-and-file lawmakers who want a more progressiv­e tax system.

“If the capital gains tax is not in that final package, then all we are doing is taxing the middle class to death in this state,” he said, adding that no one wants a repeat of the 2017 budget debate.

That exercise stretched on for 10 months and Elliott noted that many tentative budget concepts never passed muster with rankand-file lawmakers. “We basically had to come back and start over again and again,” he said.

Not all of Lamont’s tax proposals were seen as regressive, though.

Small brick-and-mortar retailers welcomed the governor’s proposal to replace the special one percent sales tax rate on digital downloads with the standard 6.35 percent rate, and sources said this was included in the framework.

Hospital relief on hold

There also was agreement between the administra­tion and Democratic legislativ­e leaders on how to tax Connecticu­t’s hospitals.

After years of steadily increasing burdens on hospitals, legislator­s in 2017 adopted a plan to give the industry a break, beginning this July. That would not happen under the tentative deal.

For the past two fiscal years, hospitals have paid $900 million annually through a provider tax. The industry also gets $496 million per year in supplement­al payments back from Connecticu­t as part of a complicate­d arrangemen­t to leverage more federal Medicaid dollars for the state. Starting in July, the annual tax was supposed to drop to $384 million, with supplement­al payments also declining to $167 million.

Still, hospitals collective­ly pay $404 million more per year than they get back, and that gap was supposed to shrink this summer to $217 million. The tentative framework includes a recommenda­tion both from the governor and from the finance committee that maintains the tax at $900 million.

It was unclear whether state payments back to the industry would change under this tentative framework, though Lamont had proposed they would drop by $43 million per year.

Sources also said the tentative framework makes few major changes to the spending plan recommende­d by the legislatur­e’s Appropriat­ions Committee for each of the next two fiscal years.

Though talks continue, legislator­s still had not agreed Friday to a Lamont proposal to establish an asset test on the Medicare Savings Program, a state plan that helps low- and middle-income seniors pay health care costs not covered by federal Medicare.

The tentative framework also includes additional funding Lamont proposed to assist Connecticu­t’s nursing home industry.

Nursing homes that serve Medicaid patients would receive a 2 percent rate increase in July 2019, a 1 percent hike in October 2020 and a final 1 percent bump in January 2021.

 ?? Arnold Gold/ Hearst Connecticu­t Media ?? Gov. Ned Lamont
Arnold Gold/ Hearst Connecticu­t Media Gov. Ned Lamont

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States