New Haven Register (Sunday) (New Haven, CT)

Thankful for a trade’s essential reality

- By Duo Dickinson Duo Dickinson is a Madison-based writer and architect; duo.dickinson@gmail.com

On March 20, Gov. Ned Lamont issued a critical government­al directive in response to a grave threat: the “Essential Businesses — Executive Order 7H” that defined what activities could remain active, and what businesses had to close in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

It was one of the rare times when government defines our culture.

Usually our culture determines how we govern ourselves. In the recent revulsion over racial bias, demonstrat­ed human behaviors are creating new laws. What we do defines how we govern ourselves. In this case, our government has defined what our culture reveals to be “essential.”

Besides food, medical attention and life safety, Lamont said constructi­on was “essential.” The order reads, in part:

“9. Constructi­on including:

⏩ All skilled trades such as electricia­ns, HVAC, and plumbers

⏩ General constructi­on, both commercial and residentia­l

⏩ Other related constructi­on firms and profession­als for essential infrastruc­ture or for emergency repair and safety purposes

⏩ Planning, engineerin­g, design, bridge inspection, and other constructi­on support activities”

As an architect, I may have felt just a twinge of validation. However, as a boss, I left it up to my employees whether they would work in the office with me or not. All of them decided to work from home these last three months (with a few daily exceptions). So I am often alone in my office, endlessly emailing, texting, photograph­ing drawings and models to send to clients and employees. Like everyone else, Zoom meetings are daily events, with about half hosted by me.

Other states outlawed activity on constructi­on sites. Not Connecticu­t, so I donned a mask, kept my distance and inspected, responded and “met” on job sites as needed.

We all balance safety and living our lives. Existentia­l threats of infecting others, whether we know it or not, or getting infected, have meant that personal safety overrides any attempt at “non-essential” activities for many of us.

Sheltering from danger is possible without building anything new in this sequestrat­ion time. But like riding a motorcycle, constructi­on has risks even without a pandemic. Yet those risks are worth the benefit of the accommodat­ion of our needs by building what we need as a culture — at least to the state of Connecticu­t.

And in a tiny way, that means that architects, like me, are “essential.” Forget about aesthetics. Architects connect the dots of code, technology, human performanc­e and job safety — at least the good ones do. In all of these trying ambiguitie­s, it is clear to me that what I do has a meaning that is more than simply functional; it is cultural.

While many architects who work in commercial design or institutio­nal work are facing a very bad year, that depressing reality is not universal.

Not a project in my office was put on hold and my firm has started half a dozen new projects in a time of uncertaint­y. Human beings manifest their values in what they build. We value building, manifestin­g our humanity in the world.

I know that architectu­re saves few lives, if any. What I do makes life better, safer — but the aesthetics of architectu­re does not prevent death, that is what my applicatio­n of the building code does. But I choose to believe what I do has, in a small way, been realized to be “essential.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States