New York Daily News

THE NEWS SAYS

-

People will die because too many senators of both parties voted not just against banning the most lethal firearms and ammunition magazines, but also against imposing near-universal background checks on gun buyers. ... This was the work of a grossly undemocrat­ic house in the thrall of the gun lobby.

The massacre of 20 children by a madman with an assault rifle was of no moment as the Senate voted down the most reasonable of gun controls in a cowardly, unconscion­able choice of ideology over life. People will die because too many senators of both parties voted not just against banning the most lethal firearms and ammunition magazines, but also against imposing near-universal background checks on gun buyers.

Criminals and the mentally ill will continue to freely purchase weapons over the Internet and at gun shows — and some will kill with them, as some already have.

Deranged individual­s will have greater access to a market saturated by ever more assault rifles — and some will slaughter with them, as some already have in Newtown, Aurora, Tucson and other mass killing fields.

Going into Wednesday’s session, there was no hope for stemming further traffic in assault weapons and high-capacity magazines. The dispiritin­gly limited question was whether the Senate would honor the country’s overwhelmi­ng support for the checks.

As the roll call was taken, it mattered not that nine out of 10 Americans have consistent­ly told pollsters they want guns kept out of the hands of people like Dmitry Smirnov, a domestic abuser who bought a .40-caliber pistol on the Internet and used it to kill a woman he had dated.

Nor did it matter that loved ones of the Sandy Hook dead looked on, distraught, from the gallery as uncaring, unthinking senators cast votes with a disdainful downward point of thumb or finger.

Represente­d by Mark Barden, who lost his 7year-old son, Daniel, in the Newtown slaughter, the families responded with grace and steadfastn­ess. Standing with President Obama, Barden said of their experience in the nation’s capital:

“We came with a sense of hope, optimistic that a real conversati­on could begin that would ultimately save the lives of so many Americans . . . . We return home for now, disappoint­ed but not defeated. We return home with a determinat­ion that change will happen, maybe not today, but soon.”

The final count was 54 to 46. Although that was a solid majority of support, it fell short in a body requiring a supermajor­ity of 60 votes for passage.

Match the senators who cast negative votes against the proportion of the U.S. population they represent, and you arrive at the devastatin­g finding that the supposed will of only 37% of Americans prevailed.

This was not democracy in action by any remote stretch of the imaginatio­n.

This was the work of a grossly undemocrat­ic house in the thrall of the gun lobby.

This was, as Obama said, “a pretty shameful day for Washington.”

And the shame was all the deeper because the background check legislatio­n was the work of a courageous compromise by a Democrat, Joe Manchin of West Virginia, and a Republican, Pat Toomey of Pennsylvan­ia, both of whom have A ratings from the National Rifle Associatio­n.

In decency and responsibi­lity, Manchin and Toomey proposed a law that would merely have mandated the same scrutiny for Internet and gun show buyers as has long been given to people who purchase guns through licensed dealers.

Since those background checks started in 1999, the system has blocked a whopping 1.7 million sales to would-be buyers who had no b business owning weapons.

With precise aim, Mayor Bloomberg cut to the bottom line by saying the minority of senators who ruled the day had “handed criminals a huge victory, by preserving their ability t to buy guns illegally at gun shows and online and keeping the illegal traffickin­g market well-fed.”

With equal precision and cont trolled outrage, Obama zeroed in on the disgracefu­l dynamics behind the Senate vote. It was because he had said “enough” to gun violence after the massacre that the check measure got as far as it did.

Working with the Sandy Hook families, as noble a group as there could be, Obama forced gun control onto the agenda and kept it there only to see the Senate minority — 90% of Republican­s and a handful of Democrats — do the legislatio­n in.

He was right that the gun lobby had “willfully lied about the bill,” falsely claiming it would have created “some sort of ‘Big Brother’ ” gun registry.

He was right that no senator can “offer any good reason why we wouldn’t want to make it harder for criminals and those with severe mental illness to buy a gun.”

He was right that Republican­s and Democrats “worried that the gun lobby would spend a lot of money and paint them as anti-Second Amendment.”

And he and Barden were oh, so right that this fight is not lost. Said Barden:

“We are here and we will always be here because we have no other choice. . . . We are not going away, and every day, as more people are killed in this country because of gun violence, our determinat­ion grows. Now is still the time.”

Now more than ever — to save lives and to reclaim government of the people, by the people and for the people from zealots bathed in blood.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States