New York Daily News

Learning, together, to talk about death

- BY DR. JACQUELYN CORLEY

Ipulled up the CT scan. Bright-red blood had washed over the patient’s left frontal lobe like water colors running down a canvas. A man, the patient’s husband, blinked back the tears welling up the front of his eyes. I was too afraid to break his gaze.

He choked as he voiced the question. Though he was a grown man, he appeared to me small and sounded like a child.

“Will she recover?” he asked. “Just tell me. Can she live through this?”

I inhaled. A million words flooded into my mind; I had to choose carefully.

“Just say it. Tell me,” his desperate voice pleaded with me.

My feet were in quick sand. In the back of my mind I heard my attending physician’s voice, as he put it to me: “She has very little chance for meaningful recovery. We can offer them surgery, but tell them she will never be the same again.”

This was the right thing to say, I told myself. But I felt crushed by the responsibi­lity of talking to this family. They were strangers to me, but I was thrust into a completely intimate and emotional moment with them.

What if I chose the wrong words? What if my facial expression was wrong? What if I seemed insensitiv­e? They might remember this moment for the rest of their lives.

As it turns out, many doctors often feel a similar anxiety. In a national poll conducted earlier in 2016, nearly all physician participan­ts agreed end-of-life health care discussion­s are significan­t, but almost half reported they feel unsure of what to say. In fact, less than one-third of the doctors reported having any formal training on these sensitive topics.

Even Medicare recognizes the importance of these discussion­s; at the start of this year, Medicare began covering advance care planning as a separate and billable service.

These policy changes were intended for outpatient office settings, but the substance of the conversati­on is no different for inpatient hospital-based clinicians, who often encounter unexpected tragedies, when emotions run high and often uncontroll­ed.

And while end-of-life care choices rely heavily not on doctors themselves but on the loved ones who make decisions in these circumstan­ces, I am still haunted by the fact that the way I frame these discussion­s may change the outcome.

Researcher­s at the University of Pittsburgh explored this phenomenon in a randomized study in which community volunteers were presented hypothetic­al scenarios that involved making critical decisions for sick loved ones.

They found in some scenarios in which doctors that led the conversati­ons engaged in specific framing strategies, participan­ts were less likely to choose CPR for a sick patient. Framing strategies included how CPR was described and possible alternativ­es.

For example, using the phrase “allow for natural death” as opposed to using the phrase “Do not resuscitat­e” altered the way families and patients reacted to the question. Also, framing the social norm as not choosing CPR resulted in fewer surrogates choosing CPR.

Doctors are granted a unique privilege to care for patients in their last hours and to help guide families through very difficult decisions. However, this influence generates a grave responsibi­lity, and we must carefully navigate the fine line between being realistic and being paternalis­tic.

Patients and doctors are tasked with two important undertakin­gs. For patients, honestly discussing what we physicians call “code status” is critical so that surrogate decision-makers, often the family, may avoid having to make difficult and life-altering choices, allowing them to deliver a patient’s end-of-life wishes rather than inserting their own desires.

For doctors, preparatio­n and practice, both formal and informal, should become the norm. Just like any skill acquired in medicine, end-of-life conversati­ons must be learned through coordinate­d efforts. In situations where a simple discussion can mean the difference between prolonged stress and increased costs or even the end of a human life, sensitive word choice and contextual framing can make all the difference.

Corley is a neurologic­al surgery resident at Duke University Medical Center and writer.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States