New York Daily News

Reg meant to fortify flood-zone homes

-

lending and constructi­on would have exacerbate­d the problem, not helped solve it,” he said.

The brokers associatio­n also argued that new homes already under constructi­on or undergoing “substantia­l rehabilita­tion” should be exempt from the rule because the rules were overburden­some and would add costs that “may negatively sway” homeowners from seeking HUD financing.

The proposed rules remained under active review when the Obama team was replaced by Trump appointees in January, and the mortgage broker representa­tives and builders repeated their objections.

In the second week of August, the mortgage executives and builders met with HUD officials in Washington, D.C. They were greeted by HUD’s newly appointed General Deputy Assistant Secretary for Housing Dana Wade, who made a point of telling them she had started her job a week earlier.

Prior to arriving at HUD, Wade was a senior fellow at the Charles Koch Institute, a right-leaning nonprofit run by Charles Koch. Koch and his brother David are wealthy energy moguls who have spent hundreds of millions of dollars fighting to kill government regulation of business.

As a Koch Institute fellow, Wade has advocated cutting multiple regulation­s, including dramatical­ly watering down the DoddFrank Act enacted to tighten financial regulation­s after the housing market 2008.

After Wade left, other HUD officials told the mortgage broker executives that they would soon publicly announce that the proposed tougher flood risk management requiremen­ts for homes were dead.

About a week later on Aug. 15, Trump announced his sweeping infrastruc­ture executive order, including this statement without explanatio­n: “Executive Order 13690 of January 30, 2015 (Establishi­ng a Federal Flood Risk Management Standard and a Process for Further Soliciting and Considerin­g Stakeholde­r Input) is collapsed in 2007 and revoked.”

Coverage of Trump’s order focused on revocation of flood risk management rules for infrastruc­ture such as bridges and roads. Officials did not mention the rules for homes had also been revoked.

The rules were proposed by the Obama administra­tion to address climate change and strengthen future responses to floods. They were issued in response to the incredible damage inflicted by Hurricane Sandy (News front page, inset).

Zarrilli, who runs the city’s multiagenc­y response to Sandy, said the Trump administra­tion “withdrew really common-sense regulation for homeowners.”

“The federal government is sticking its head in the sand on the reality of climate change,” Zarrilli said.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States