New York Daily News

Behind the drama, complexiti­es lurk

Korean leaders’ worries

- BY JOSHUA POLLACK Pollack is a senior research associate at the James Martin Center for Nonprolife­ration Studies.

The drama of Friday’s scenes at the “truce village” of Panmunjom, between the two Koreas, can hardly be overstated. Surrounded by his advisers, North Korean leader Kim Jong Un descended the front steps of Panmungak — the monumental structure on the northern side — to shake hands with South Korean President Moon Jae-in, who stood waiting to receive him at the “military demarcatio­n line” between the two sides.

Kim stepped into South Korea, the first time a North Korean leader has done so since the Korean War. Both men then stepped together into North Korea, where Moon’s parents were born, before returning to the South. Men in traditiona­l Korean dress ceremoniou­sly escorted the pair down a red carpet toward “Peace House,” where they reviewed an honor guard before entering.

The summit meeting lasted a day and yielded a long joint declaratio­n, the third issued after a North-South summit since 2000.

And that document, whose text has been released, seems promising at first. Titled “Panmunjom Declaratio­n for Peace, Prosperity and Unificatio­n of the Korean Peninsula,” it opens with a bold assertion: “there will be no more war on the Korean Peninsula and thus a new era of peace has begun.”

But a comparison with the last such document — the “Declaratio­n on the Advance of South-North Korean Relations, Peace and Prosperity,” issued on October 4, 2007, after a two-day summit meeting in Pyongyang — underscore­s how little progress has achieved in the intervenin­g decade.

The two texts are mostly the same, touching on the importance of “inter-Korean relations,” people-to-people exchanges, reducing the danger of war, pursuing a permanent “peace regime” to replace the Korean War Armistice, and (of course) reaffirmin­g old commitment­s to “denucleari­zation.”

All of this is to say that there has been no progress on any of these fronts in the meantime. The 2007 declaratio­n also included a detailed agenda for joint economic projects, all of which are now ruled out by internatio­nal sanctions.

Little wonder that Kim, in remarks before the television cameras upon the signing of the new declaratio­n, recalled the disappoint­ing agreements of the past, “which marked only beginnings.”

On the other side of the ledger, South Korean officials are quick to point out that Moon is barely a year into his term as president. He also enjoys high public approval ratings. For that matter, Kim is still a young man who faces no credible threats to his power at home.

The real question, then, is how the two leaders now navigate what Kim called a “headwind” or a “wind from outside” Korea, which will otherwise frustrate progress — apparently his diplomatic allusion to American policy.

As President Trump said once again at a press conference with German Chancellor Angela Merkel, he will not repeat hte mistakes of the past by relaxing sanctions until North Korea has completely surrendere­d its nuclear program.

This stance may be at odds with the new joint declaratio­n, which envisions carrying disarmamen­t “in a phased manner” as military tensions are reduced. It is starkly at odds with Kim’s highly publicized declaratio­n of a new party line last week, which called for rebuilding the North Korean economy while retaining nuclear weapons as “a powerful treasured sword for defending peace . . . and the firm guarantee by which our descendant­s can enjoy the most dignified and happiest life in the world.”

If the White House holds to its all-or-nothing position on sanctions, then North Korea will struggle in its efforts to earn foreign currency and attract foreign investment­s. Kim may or may not be feeling the pressure today, but the sanctions regime will undoubtedl­y complicate his plans for growth.

Under these conditions, it is unclear whether an anticipate­d summit meeting will take place between Kim and Trump, or what it will yield if it does occur.

Judging by the new joint declaratio­n, Moon is determined to continue on his own with Kim if necessary. Military-to-military talks will open in May; inter-Korean family reunions are scheduled for August; and Moon has accepted an invitation to visit Pyongyang this fall.

These interactio­ns, along with Kim’s unilateral decision to end long-range missile tests and nuclear tests, should help to prevent a return to the crisis atmosphere of 2017. If it precludes Trumpian threats of “fire and fury,” then further engagement between the two Koreas for the best. But none of it will be terribly dramatic.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States