ODD TALE OF BIDEN’S SON AND A RUSSIAN EMAIL FAILS TO CLICK
Hard to connect laptop left at repair shop to any scandal
WASHINGTON — Looking to undermine rival Joe Biden 20 days before the election, President Trump’s campaign has seized on a tabloid story offering bizarre twists to a familiar line of attack: Biden’s relationship with Ukraine. But the story in the New York Post raises more questions than answers, including about the authenticity of an email at the center of the story.
The origins of the story also trace back to Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani, who has repeatedly pushed unfounded claims about Biden and his son, Hunter Biden. Even if the emails in the Post are legitimate, they don’t validate Trump and Giuliani’s claims that Biden’s actions were influenced by his son’s business dealings in Ukraine.
A look at the development:
HOW DID BIDEN’S SON BECOME A CAMPAIGN ISSUE?
Hunter Biden joined the board of the Ukrainian gas company Burisma in 2014, around the time his father, then U.S. vice president, was helping conduct the Obama administration’s foreign policy with Ukraine.
Senate Republicans said in a recent report that the appointment may have posed a conflict of interest, but they did not present evidence that the hiring influenced U.S. policies.
Trump and his supporters, meanwhile, have advanced a widely discredited theory that Biden pushed for the firing of Ukraine’s top prosecutor to protect his son and Burisma from investigation. Biden did indeed press for the prosecutor’s firing, but that’s because he was reflecting the official position of not only the Obama administration but many Western countries and because the prosecutor was perceived as soft on corruption.
WHAT DOES THE NEW YORK POST STORY SAY?
The main email highlighted by the Post is an April 2015 message that it said was sent to Hunter Biden by Vadym Pozharskyi, an adviser to Burisma’s board. In it, he thanks the younger Biden “for inviting me to DC and giving an opportunity to meet your father and spent (sic) some time together. It’s realty (sic) an honor and pleasure.”
The wording makes it unclear if he actually met Joe Biden. The Biden campaign said in a statement that it had reviewed Biden’s schedules from the time and that no meeting as described by the newspaper took place.
HOW DID THE POST OBTAIN THE EMAILS?
It’s a tangled saga. The Post says it received a copy of a hard drive containing the messages on Sunday from Giuliani, who has pushed the unfounded idea that Ukraine was trying to interfere with the 2016 election and that the younger Biden may have enriched himself by selling his access to his father.
The Post says the emails were part of a trove of data recovered from a laptop that was dropped off at a computer repair shop in Delaware in April 2019. It says the customer, whom the owner could not definitively identify as Hunter Biden, never paid for the service or retrieved it, and says the owner made a copy of the hard drive that he provided to Giuliani’s lawyer.
The owner of the Wilmington shop declined to comment Wednesday to Associated Press, saying he didn’t feel like talking. The newspaper says the owner alerted the FBI to the computer and hard drive, and that agents took possession of them. That could not immediately be confirmed, and the FBI declined to comment.
Asked via text by an AP reporter how long he had the hard drive, Giuliani replied, in part: “You’re interested in the wrong thing. This time the truth will not be defeated by process. I’ve got a lot more to go.”
ARE THE NEW EMAILS AUTHENTIC?
The actual origins of the emails are unclear. And disinformation experts say there are multiple red flags that raise doubts about their authenticity, including questions about whether the laptop actually belongs to Hunter Biden, said Nina Jankowicz, a fellow at the nonpartisan Wilson Center in Washington.
The Biden campaign didn’t address that issue Wednesday, but
Hunter Biden’s lawyer, George Mesires, said in a statement to the AP that “we have no idea where this came from, and certainly cannot credit anything that Rudy Giuliani provided to the NY Post.” He added that “what I do know for certain is that this purported meeting never happened.”
Another potential alarm is the involvement of another Trump associate, Steve Bannon, who the Post says first alerted it to the existence of the hard drive and who along with Giuliani has been active in promoting an anti-Biden narrative on Ukraine.
“We should view it as a Trump campaign product,” Jankowicz said.
Thomas Rid, a political scientist and disinformation expert at Johns Hopkins University’s School of Advanced International Studies, said it was not clear to him yet whether the emails were hacked or forged but said they “could be either or both.”
“It’s a common feature in these operations that you combine generic content, accurate content, with forged content,” Rid said.
IF AUTHENTIC, ARE THESE EMAILS DAMAGING TO BIDEN?
The suggestion that Joe Biden might have met with a Burisma representative is consequential, because he has repeatedly insisted that he never discussed his son’s business with him.
But the emails provide no details on whether Pozharskyi and Biden actually met and, if so, what they discussed.
If Biden did meet with Pozharskyi, he was not the only U.S. official who may have done so. Pozharskyi was part of a Burisma delegation that lobbied congressional officials in 2014 in an attempt to show that the firm was not a corruption risk.
Intelligence officials warned President Trump that Rudy Giuliani — hero of 9⁄11 and once New York’s and America’s mayor — was likely a Russian dupe, a bombshell Washington Post story reported Thursday.
The report came as Giuliani was under fire over the authenticity of an “October surprise” email given credence by a Republican-aligned New York news outlet.
The email helped resurrect widely-discredited GOP claims that Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden was influenced by his son Hunter’s work for a Ukranian gas company.
The email and other material in the story came from the hard drive of a laptop that was found in a Delaware computer repair shop that purportedly belonged to Hunter Biden.
The FBI is investigating whether the information supposedly from the laptop was linked to a foreign intelligence operation, NBC News reported Thursday night.
The October surprise story purports to show an April 2015 message from an advisor to the company Burisma thanking Hunter Biden — then a member of Burisma’s board — for arranging a meeting with his father, who was then the vice president.
Joe Biden and his son denied any such meeting ever occurred.
“We have no idea where this came from, and certainly cannot credit anything that Rudy Giuliani provided,” said a statement from Hunter Biden’s attorney, George Mesires. “What I do know for certain is this meeting never happened.”
When Giuliani went to Ukraine in December to investigate Burisma and the Bidens, he interacted with “people tied to Russian intelligence,” the Washington Post reported Thursday night.
Intelligence officials feared Giuliani — a former federal prosecutor who is now a Trump lawyer and freelance White House investigator — was being used to feed Russian misinformation to the president, four former officials familiar with the matter told the newspaper.
Their warning to Trump, one of the officials told the newspaper, was: “Do what you want to do, but your friend Rudy has been worked by Russian assets in Ukraine.”
Trump “shrugged his shoulders” at the warning, the former official said. “That’s Rudy,” the president said dismissively.
Giuliani was not being tracked by U.S. intelligence while he was in Ukraine, the Washington Post said.
But some of the people he met in Ukraine were being tracked, said the newspaper — and that tracking led U.S. intelligence to intercept Giuliani’s communications with them.
In his latest effort to push Trump’s narrative about Biden’s supposed ties to Burisma, Giuliani was joined by Steve Bannon, the former top White House advisor.
Trump has been advancing for years a widely discredited tale about Biden lobbying for the firing of Ukraine’s top prosecutor to protect his son and Burisma from a criminal probe.
The Obama administration favored the dismissal because the prosecutor was perceived as soft on crime.
Bannon was arrested last month for wire fraud and money-laundering after allegedly pocketing $1 million in a scam fundraiser for the construction of a wall on America’s southern border. He is currently free on $5 million bail.