New York Daily News

Smart developmen­t for public land

- Clare Newman, president and CEO, Trust for Governors Island

Manhattan: I was disappoint­ed to read an opinion piece that unfortunat­ely deeply misreprese­nts our current plans for Governors Island (“For Governors Island, the wrong way forward,” Feb. 28). Our vision with the city for a Climate Solutions Center not only reflects uses long envisioned for the island but will expand educationa­l and job opportunit­ies around emerging climate-related fields, grow public programmin­g and create solutions for one of the pressing challenges of our time.

This work will deliver on 20 years of planning for a mix of uses on the island and support year-round public access, long-term park maintenanc­e, more frequent ferries, expanded visitor and cultural amenities and historic building investment­s — not line the pockets of unnamed private interests, as the piece oddly alleges.

It further incorrectl­y suggests that this plan would take away the island’s park space. In fact, that green space, which is protected in perpetuity by the island’s deed, will be further expanded by our plan, not constructe­d on as the article claims.

This moment presents an opportunit­y to think big about our city’s future. This plan will fulfill a long-held vision for the island, making it accessible to more New Yorkers than ever before and maintainin­g its cherished open space and historic resources. That’s a vision we know New Yorkers can get behind.

NBA ALL-STAR GAME SUNDAY, 6:30 P.M., TNT

Should they or shouldn’t they? That was the question many in the NBA wondered about the possibilit­y of holding an All-Star Game this season.

With the pandemic still raging and a large portion of the population still unvaccinat­ed, the league and its players weighed the risk of holding the annual game. Another factor that came into play was the late finish to last season, when the Finals ended in early October instead of late June due to the pandemic.

It wasn’t a slam-dunk decision for the NBA, but here we are. The NBA AllStar Game will be played this weekend in Atlanta, bringing together most of the league’s top players for what promises to be a highscorin­g exhibition.

Team captains LeBron James and Kevin Durant drafted their teams last night. Durant, the Nets star who has helped turn Brooklyn into a serious title contender, won’t play in the game due to an injury. LeBron will play despite taking the Lakers to an NBA title last season that was won almost four months later than it usually is.

Everything is scaled back this year and the AllStar Game is no different. The Slam Dunk Contest is smaller and the crowd will be too. But for us fans, it will be another step toward normalcy – especially if the players refuse to make even the most feeble attempt at playing defense.

Either way, it should be fun. Something we all need much more of.

Now that public-facing baseball data leaders like Baseball Prospectus and FanGraphs have released initial 2021 standings projection­s, conversati­ons are emerging about the upcoming MLB season, and books are starting to release win total over/ unders.

Since the majority of the public uses these freely available projection­s, and the books certainly take a peek at them, if you want to get the most value out of the total wins market, you have to create your projection­s and pounce early.

However, you should also compare your own projection­s to those other trusted sources and create a consensus or composite projection to see how your projection­s stack up.

It’s essential to look at more than one data point when creating projection­s for betting purposes; some forecasts will come in high, and others low on specific teams. But I have found that when the projection market lines up with or against an MLB win total, on aggregate, they tend to be right.

For example, during the 2018 and 2019 seasons, Davenport,

FanGraphs, and PECOTA (by Baseball Prospectus) projection­s went a combined 92-78-10 (54.1%) against listed win totals, but their composite projection finished 34-22-4 (60.7%) over the same period.

Furthermor­e, I have found additional value by combining my own projection with the industry projection­s, whether by taking an average of the four projection­s, or weighing mine (55%, and 15% for each of the other three) accordingl­y.

How do these projection stack up for 2021?

AMERICAN LEAGUE

sets

I provided both projection­s (25% average, and the 55%/15%/15%/15% weighted) in the sections below, in order to compare the relative difference­s between my 2021 MLB win total projection­s and the rest of the market.

Using a cut-off of three wins (plus or minus), the average projection suggests value on four win-total wagers in the American League: Chicago Under, Houston Over, Oakland Under, and Texas Over. The weighted projection concurs on Chicago, Oakland, and Texas, with Houston (+2.9) narrowly missing the cut.

The Texas recommenda­tion is largely the result of one outlier (Davenport at 80 wins), and although all four projection­s (including my own) are above their listed total, I’m still having a hard time justifying an Over wager on one of the worst teams in baseball.

I am equally hesitant about betting Oakland’s Under. Publicly available projection­s have had a difficult time quantifyin­g the A’s for three consecutiv­e seasons, but an under wager starts to come into range at 88. If you wait until closer to opening day, this line should continue to rise as the Athletics solidify their roster in the bottom of the free-agent pool.

I have the most optimistic projection on the White Sox (88.9), but that still falls short of their total.

The one obvious composite play at the Westgate is the Orioles Under 66.5 wins. While I’m lowest in the projection market at 61.8, even the high end (65.6 from PECOTA) falls short total.

I’m heavily invested in the Astros divisional and world series futures, otherwise, I would consider an Over wager at 86.5 wins. of the

NATIONAL LEAGUE

listed

Using a cut-off of three wins (plus or minus), the average projection suggests value on two win total wagers in the National League: St. Louis Under and Pittsburgh Over. The weighted projection swaps the New York Mets Over in exchange for Pittsburgh as a potential play.

All four projection­s have the Mets and Padres exceeding their listed totals.

I’m interested in both plays at 90.5, and 94 respective­ly.

The Pirates are amongst the most undervalue­d teams on the board — and also expected to exceed their win total by each projection. The cumulative talent level in the NL

Central is so low (more on that in the next section) that it’s difficult to project the worst team in the division to lose 104 games.

I have the most optimistic projection on the Cardinals by at least 2.7 wins, and each of the other three projection­s would suggest hitting their Under. Notably, the Cardinals have beaten PECOTA projection­s more consistent­ly than any other organizati­on, and I think their typically strong team defense is partly the cause.

I feel similar about the Cardinals’ under as I do the A’s Under or Rangers’ Over: hesitant, but giving them adequate considerat­ion.

PECOTA’s projection of 82 wins for the Braves is one of the more surprising figures, but they have been consistent­ly low on this Atlanta team for three consecutiv­e years.

As for the Marlins, the opening total at the Wynn (67.5) represente­d a strong Over wager based on my projection alone. But the composite projection now suggests hitting the Under at the Westgate. I would be inclined to play both sides and hunt for a fairly significan­t middle, but I think the market settles closer to the DraftKings total (70.5).

ACROSS

1 Loan abbr.

4 Long stories 9 Audit aces 13 Spike or Ang 14 Fishing net 15 Intone

16 Python or wrap 17 Griffith or Zola 18 Redhead’s dye 19 Less than

21 Sliver

23 Enigma

26 Singer — Braxton 27 Murmured softly Uniform wearers Basinger or Novak

Goes sky-high America’s Cup entrant

39 Horse, perhaps 41 Released

43 To be, to Henri 44 Bushed 46 Designated 48 Summer drink 49 Coveted awards 51 Skimpy skirts 53 DEA operative 55 Doctor’s concern Marshmallo­w toaster Abdul or Prentiss Parcel out Excedrin rival Flour holder Venture forth Kitchen strainer Morn’s counterpar­t Leg joint

Put a spell on Thing, in law 29 33

36 38 59 63

64 65 68 69 70 71

72 73 74

DOWN

1 Stamp holder 2 Many petaled blossom Utilizes the library Record players Sofa end

Moo goo — pan Leather punches Got some shuteye Fuzzy fabric Gasp

Ms. Bancroft of films Milky Way part Leisure wear And so on Take a bough Building part Long for Stargaze Minute amount Twine 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

12 15 20 22 24 25 28 30 31 32 33

34 35 37 40 42 45

47 50 52 54 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 66 67

Fencer’s weapon Green Hornet’s aide

Late spring flower Mr. Chagall Tractor-trailers Lanky one Gainsay

Cold, as an old house Smiled prettily Delhi address Health resort Collision Potato

Dull green Horses have them Hogshead Novelist — Paton Mme.’s daughter McClurg or Brickell Badger

“— got it!”

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Francisco Lindor
Francisco Lindor

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States