New York Daily News

There’s no vaccine for hypocrisy

- BY DEBBIE KAMINER Kaminer is a professor of law at Zicklin School of Business/Baruch College, CUNY.

The latest battle in the COVID-19 culture wars involves “vaccine passports,” with some Republican leaders taking a surprising­ly anti-business and pro-regulation stance. Despite the term’s ubiquity, there is no one official vaccine passport, and the term simply refers to proof of vaccinatio­n, whether digital or hardcopy, such as a CDC vaccinatio­n card. Over the past few weeks, with a number of red states leading the way, there has been growing conservati­ve backlash to any type of vaccine passport and some politician­s are claiming that all proof of vaccinatio­n requiremen­ts violates personal freedom and private choice.

What is lost in this argument is the crucial distinctio­n between government requiring individual­s to have proof of vaccinatio­n to access venues such as stores, restaurant­s, concerts and sporting events and a private business requiring such proof. Republican­s once understood such distinctio­ns and consistent­ly stood on the side of private actors making decisions that made sense for them.

Despite the conservati­ve outrage, there is nothing new about government mandates requiring proof of vaccinatio­n. All 50 states currently require some form of compulsory vaccinatio­n for children attending K-12 schools, and various states also mandate vaccinatio­n for college students, as well as employees in nursing homes and health-care facilities. There are also branches of local government that have already announced they will mandate the COVID-19 vaccine in certain venues, and more are likely to follow. For example, Erie Country N.Y. Executive Mark Poloncarz announced that starting in the fall all fans and staff attending home games of the Buffalo Bills and Sabres must be vaccinated. Some conservati­ves oppose already existing vaccine mandates, and it is logically consistent that they would similarly oppose government-mandated proof of COVID-19 vaccinatio­n in the same or similar contexts.

However, these government mandates should not be conflated with completely private vaccine mandates where a private entity independen­tly chooses to require proof of vaccinatio­n — and where there is no government action — and yet that is exactly what is happening. Private businesses have been decimated by the COVID-19 pandemic, and some have concluded that the best way to protect their business interests as we emerge into better days is by choosing to require that their customers and employees be vaccinated.

Particular­ly in businesses where people gather in crowded indoor environmen­ts such as bars, gyms, restaurant­s and theaters, owners are understand­ably apprehensi­ve about the spread of infection. Further, in consumer-based industries, a vaccinatio­n requiremen­t could increase some customers’ comfort with frequentin­g the business. Antidiscri­mination laws already provide protection to individual­s who require a medical or religious exemption from a COVID-19 vaccine mandate.

And yet, in a clear case of government overreach, some Republican politician­s have enacted regulation­s banning private businesses from choosing to require the COVID-19 vaccine. For example, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis recently issued an executive order that prohibited not only Florida government entities, but also private Florida businesses from requiring customers to provide any type of vaccine passports — defined broadly as “any documentat­ion certifying COVID-19 vaccinatio­n.” The order itself attempts to justify this significan­t regulation of private business as necessary to protect the “free flow of commerce.” This is a very strange position for one of the leaders of the Republican Party, which brands itself as being pro-business and anti-regulation.

Essentiall­y, Florida’s executive order is turning unvaccinat­ed people into a protected class under the state’s anti-discrimina­tion laws. Just as state anti-discrimina­tion laws protect customers from discrimina­tion based on fundamenta­l characteri­stics such as race, sex or religion, Florida now has added those who have not received the COVID-19 vaccine. While Florida’s executive order has received significan­t media attention, similar bills prohibitin­g private businesses from requiring customers or employees to be vaccinated have been introduced in other states around the country including Alabama, Arizona, Iowa, Montana and Wisconsin.

Unlike DeSantis, Gov. Greg Abbott of Texas has somewhat recognized the distinctio­n between government and private mandates. While Abbott recently issued an executive order prohibitin­g COVID-19 vaccine passports by “all state agencies and political subdivisio­ns” the Texas order only covers private businesses that “receive public funds.”

Yet this distinctio­n has been lost in much of the media coverage on vaccine passports.

Regardless of where one stands on whether government should require individual­s to have proof of the COVID-19 vaccine to access certain high-risk venues — and I do support some government mandates — it is troubling for a state to go a step further and actively take away a private business’ ability to protect itself from the worst pandemic in a century. It is also hypocritic­al for Republican­s, in the name of freedom and personal choice, to take an anti-business position that destroys the freedom and personal choice of private businesses.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States