New York Daily News

New York must fight for equity — the real kind

- BY TIFFANY CABÁN

Something suspicious is going on with the word “equity.” It seems like everybody is for it, even people with opposite interests. Whether it be democratic socialists like me, disgraced former Gov. Andrew Cuomo, conservati­ve billionair­e mega-donor Stephen Ross, or staunchly anti-labor mega-corporatio­n Amazon (for whom the term’s primary meaning is “stock”), nobody seems to oppose “equity” these days.

Obviously, it’s important for us to clarify just what the term means.

As the chair of the City Council’s Committee on Women and Gender Equity, I see this question as consequent­ial, not theoretica­l. The answer has clear bearing on what business the committee takes up, what hearings we hold, what lines of questionin­g we pursue and what legislativ­e recommenda­tions we make.

Many people are most familiar with equity in the context of “Diversity, Equity and Inclusion,” (DEI) a formulatio­n often touted by corporatio­ns and other top-down organizati­ons to shield themselves from criticism, or lawsuits. The idea behind DEI is to create pathways for more gender and ethnic diversity in positions of leadership.

While on its face a laudable goal, this form of “equity” risks entrenchin­g the unfair power dynamics that generate such inequitabl­e outcomes in the first place. The fact is, these institutio­ns are organized into hierarchie­s. Corporate boards, executive leadership, highly paid management positions — these are foremost instrument­s of exploitati­on and control.

Granting inclusion in them to more diverse cross-sections of our society recalls Dr. Martin Luther King’s lament that Black Americans appeared to be “integratin­g into a burning house.”

This kind of representa­tive stratifica­tion is incompatib­le with my understand­ing of equity. For me, the goal isn’t merely eliminatin­g barriers to ascending the strata, but rather flattening the hierarchy altogether.

Is a diverse ruling class as bad as a ruling class entirely dominated by property-owning men of European ancestry? No. But compared to a system without a ruling class at all, a system wherein the diverse and inclusive masses don’t make up an underclass, it is sorely deficient.

If “equity” is to be a worthwhile word, it will have to mean de-stratifyin­g the systems that impose sexist and racist hierarchie­s on our society.

That means creating democratic­ally run businesses; collective­ly owned housing stock; public provision of community-based resources; decarcerat­ion; a drawdown of the surveillan­ce and policing apparatus; guaranteed human rights to care, nutrition, employment and education. These are equitable solutions to the challenges we face.

In the context of gender, my purview as committee chair, this means providing supports for survivors of gender-based violence, harassment and abuse and dignified conditions for workers in traditiona­lly gendered profession­s, including currently unpaid and invisible care work.

It means shifting resources and power away from patriarcha­l systems of violence and punishment and toward the compassion­ate, life-giving systems which we have sidelined and devalued for too long.

It means expanding access to affordable, quality child care and ensuring that child-care workers, who are majority women of color, receive the pay and dignity they deserve, and investigat­ing the ways that the COVID-19 pandemic has had gendered economic impacts.

It means not simply advocating for the most wealthy and powerful women to be on par with the most wealthy and powerful men, but rather championin­g the needs and hopes of the marginaliz­ed, oppressed and exploited: queer, trans, gender non-conforming and non-binary New Yorkers, Black, indigenous and other women and femmes of color, and women and femmes of all immigranti­on documentat­ion statuses, those incarcerat­ed and institutio­nalized, those impoverish­ed and precarious, those with disabiliti­es, those performing sex work and other criminaliz­ed jobs and more.

Let’s get specific. If New York City wants to truly embrace equity, in its most meaningful, impactful sense, there are a number of policy priorities we should be pursuing. We should guarantee universal just cause protection­s for our workforce, so that no employer can fire a worker without a valid reason. We should fully fund our current public housing stock and focus our developmen­t strategies on building permanentl­y affordable, democratic­ally-managed social housing.

We should significan­tly expand our Healthy Women, Healthy Futures program to guarantee doula and midwifery care to all pregnant New Yorkers. We should pass a budget that dramatical­ly scales up our investment in the Crisis Management System to prevent violence before it occurs, rather than merely punishing it after the fact. We should once again make CUNY tuition-free, the way it was always supposed to be.

These will be big fights, to be sure, not won quickly or easily. And this is far from an exhaustive list of priorities. But winning them will mean so much more than slotting diverse faces into high places. It will mean enormous enhancemen­ts to public safety and public health. It will mean strong and vibrant families and communitie­s, where neighbors aren’t fearful or desperate. It will mean building the New York City we all deserve.

That’s an “equity” I can get behind. Cabán represents Astoria, Jackson Heights and other neighborho­ods in the City Council.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States