New York Daily News

Hearing on helipad deal delayed after News’ report on firm’s ties

- BY CHRIS SOMMERFELD­T

New York City’s economic developmen­t arm abruptly cancelled a Friday hearing on awarding a contract for operating a downtown Manhattan helipad — after the Daily News reported that conflict of interest concerns have emerged about the aviation company in line for the lucrative deal.

The hearing on issuing the contract for the Pier 6 helipad to Saker Aviation was supposed to be held in the afternoon by the city Economic Developmen­t Corporatio­n and the Franchise and Concession Review Committee, a panel that includes various local officials, including representa­tives from Mayor Adams’ office.

But hours before it was set to start, the corporatio­n, which recommende­d last month that Saker receive the contract, posted a brief notice online that the hearing is “being held over” for a future date.

The postponeme­nt comes on the heels of The News reporting that Saker’s chairman, William Wachtel, is law partners with Morgan Missry, who serves as an economic corporatio­n board member.

The Wachtel-Missry connection sparked concerns about a potential conflict of interest and prompted Thoroughbr­ed Sea & Air, a rival bidder, to file a formal complaint with the city Feb. 22 calling for an investigat­ion into whether Saker was privy to “inside informatio­n” that allowed it to gain an unfair advantage in the helipad procuremen­t process.

In a previously unknown twist, Helo Holdings, another bidder on the Pier 6 contract, filed a similar complaint on Feb. 24 raising concerns whether the ties between Wachtel (photo) and Missry “fundamenta­lly tainted” the procuremen­t, according to a copy obtained by The News.

The EDC, which is made up of mayoral appointees, said Friday that the hearing’s delay had “nothing to do” with the complaints from Helo and Thoroughbr­ed. The corporatio­n also said it “remains steadfast there is no conflict of interest” related to the proposed Saker contract and that “no confidenti­al informatio­n from one submission was shared with another bidder.”

The EDC would not say why the hearing was pushed back, though. It did say Mayor Adams’ Office of Contract Services, which plays a role on the Franchise and Concession Review Committee, made the call to postpone.

Spokespeop­le for Adams did not return requests for comment Friday afternoon. Saker CEO Sam Goldstein declined to comment.

When news of the connection between Wachtel and Missry broke last month, Wachtel said his law partner had “no involvemen­t whatsoever” in the EDC’s decision to recommend Saker gets the contract. The EDC has said the board “as a matter of course” does not involve itself directly in the corporatio­n’s “individual procuremen­ts.”

The Franchise and Concession Review Committee must ultimately sign off on the contract.

Saker has operated the Pier 6 helipad for over a decade, meaning the new proposed contract is effectivel­y a renewal.

The company would stand to earn tens of millions of dollars from the new contract, which has a five-year term. The helipad near Wall Street is mostly used by wealthy tourists and business executives who work in the area.

Aside from the conflict of interest allegation­s swirling over the Pier 6 contract, some local politician­s have questioned why the helipad should exist at all.

Manhattan Borough President Mark Levine and City Comptrolle­r Brad Lander, both of whom hold votes on the Franchise and Concession Review Committee, told The News that the expiration of Saker’s current contract “presents a huge opportunit­y to drasticall­y reduce the number of helicopter­s flying over New York City.”

“The city can find better uses for this space, including as a marine cargo facility, a hub for test flights for electrical vertical take-off and landing vehicles or use the air rights from this location to build approximat­ely 9,000 units of housing,” they said in a joint statement. “With the postponeme­nt of this hearing, we urge the city to use this time to finally hear New Yorkers over the constant whirring of these helicopter­s and reconsider the award.”

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States