New York Daily News

Borderline ill-considered

-

If you think it’s unfair for would-be concertgoe­rs to have to go through services like Ticketmast­er, you might be shocked to learn that the Biden administra­tion has issued a rule to force wouldbe asylum seekers who transited through more than one country without being rejected for asylum there first to use the government’s own glitchy app to reserve slots to apply for asylum.

A similar rule issued by the Trump administra­tion in 2019 did not survive court scrutiny, having been enjoined and then vacated by separate district courts. President Biden’s contention that his policy is substantiv­ely different because it’s not a prohibitio­n but a rebuttable presumptio­n of ineligibil­ity is basically only parsable by lawyers and makes little difference on the ground.

The rule, which is currently in a notice and comment period through March 27, is likely to get struck down by the courts, just like its predecesso­r. More broadly, the attempt to simply switch one type of heavy-handed asylum restrictio­n for another is a detestable capitulati­on to the Trump approach of managing humanitari­an migration by doing whatever possible to end most of it, despite Biden’s early and frequent assurances that his presidency would be a clean break from his predecesso­r.

Obviously, Biden is worried about the logistical challenges of handling border processing in a post-Title 42 era, given that the Trump marque policy is slated to end along with the COVID-19 emergency declaratio­n on May 11. It’s an undisputed challenge and one which countless thinkers and analysts including this very board have weighed in on how to best handle.

These include a nationwide program for connecting asylum seekers to states and localities eager to receive them and providing transport (as opposed to leaving it to chaotic and often politicall­y-motivated local bussing efforts) and rebuilding the collapsed refugee system to process people abroad before they are forced to show up at the border. They should not include simply stepping away from our humanitari­an obligation­s and the protection­s guaranteed by U.S. law.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States