New York Daily News

Advocates to city: Save $3.5B with migrant housing vouchers

- BY MICHAEL GARTLAND With Téa Kvetenadze

The city could save up to $3.5 billion in migrant housing costs if it and the state government expand access to housing vouchers, a new report from the homeless services provider Win revealed Monday.

To realize some of those projected savings, Win, a nonprofit headed by former City Council Speaker Christine Quinn, is recommendi­ng the city implement already approved expansions of the CityFHEPS voucher program and further extend voucher eligibilit­y to migrant families now prohibited from tapping into that assistance. The city would shift spending from emergency shelters and hotels under the plan.

The nonprofit’s most recent savings projection­s come as Mayor Adams’ administra­tion is continuing to struggle with an approximat­ely $10 billion price tag associated with the migrant crisis and as asylum seekers continue to flow into the Big Apple.

“We are two years into the asylum-seeker crisis, and the need for a coordinate­d and compassion­ate response across all levels of government has never been more urgent,” Quinn said. “That’s why policy solutions like expanding housing vouchers, increasing access to employment and upholding right to shelter are the commonsens­e measures we need right now.”

Under a court settlement reached in March, the city’s right-to-shelter law was modified to allow the city to deny housing to adult migrants in some cases. Quinn said Monday the impact of that modificati­on still isn’t totally clear, but she urged the administra­tion to implement it in a way that errs on the side of compassion when it comes to providing shelter to migrants.

Win’s report, which was provided to the Daily News on Monday, includes policy prescripti­ons for the federal and state government­s as well. It calls on the feds to shorten the wait time for asylum seeker work authorizat­ion and for state lawmakers to pass a law that would allow the state to issue its own work permits to migrants.

Adams’ spokeswoma­n Kayla Mamelak pushed back on the idea that the savings projected by Win can actually be realized under the current conditions and contended it would actually cost the city more.

“With more than 11,000 households with CityFHEPS vouchers already in the city shelter system unable to find housing and a rental vacancy rate of just 1.4%, a historic low in the past 60 years, the Council’s bill will only make it harder for New Yorkers in shelter to move

into permanent housing,” she said. “At the same time, this legislatio­n threatens to add $17 billion onto the backs of our taxpayers. Any insinuatio­n that this legislatio­n would somehow save the city money is just not based in fact.”

Mamelak added that the administra­tion agrees with Win in its recommenda­tions that the federal and state government­s should take a more central role in managing the crisis, but she did not address Win’s push to extend housing voucher eligibilit­y to migrants.

An expansion of CityFHEPs benefits was already enshrined into law last year when the City Council overrode the mayor’s veto of a bill package abolishing a rule requiring people stay in homeless shelters for 90 days before they can apply for the vouchers. The legislatio­n also expanded eligibilit­y by allowing those who have received written rent demands from their landlords to apply for the benefits.

Those new laws have not been implemente­d by Adams’ administra­tion, though, which has argued the laws would be too expensive, predicting they’d cost the city $17 billion over the next five years. That led the Legal Aid Society to sue the city in February to force it to enact them — a suit the Council moved to join days later. That litigation is now pending. According to Win’s estimates, implementi­ng those bills would save the city as much as $730 million and relieve the strain incoming migrants have placed on the city’s shelter system.

Quinn and Win are also pushing the city and state for a much broader eligibilit­y expansion that would include migrants. Such a move could save up to $3.1 billion a year in cash that now goes to housing asylum seekers in city shelters and hotel stays, which can cost up to $400 a night, Win estimates.

Spokesmen for Adams and Hochul did not immediatel­y respond when asked about Win’s findings.

 ?? ??
 ?? ?? Homeless services provider Win says in a report that the city could save billions by offering housing vouchers to migrants and shifting spending away from shelters like one at Randalls Island (main photo) and hotels.
Homeless services provider Win says in a report that the city could save billions by offering housing vouchers to migrants and shifting spending away from shelters like one at Randalls Island (main photo) and hotels.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States