New York Magazine

The Open-Plan Miracle Was an Auditory Disaster

To quiet the din, consider a 1976 Acoustic Conditione­r.

- By Alexandra Lange

Offices, particular­ly the open plans touted for their creative collisions, were designed to foster interactio­n. Promoters of the open plan compared it to “a busy restaurant or lively cocktail party,” writes Jennifer Kaufmann-Buhler in her recent book, Open Plan: A Design History of the American Office, “where the general ambient noise of the space masked the individual conversati­ons such that one could reasonably have a fairly private conversati­on despite being surrounded by people.” But as Robert Propst, the Herman Miller designer known as “the father of the cubicle,” soon found out, most workplaces required a little more masking, and so the plans intended to spark our creativity also spawned a new set of designs to fix the noise. In 1976, the Acoustic Conditione­r was born. Each spherical conditione­r, set atop a slender stalk, could be clipped to the top of a padded partition and was intended to “condition” the atmosphere for workers within a 12-foot diameter while looking like a George Lucas reject. Most companies focused on less obtrusive office-wide technology, hiding machines behind acoustic ceiling tiles (yes, ugly drop ceilings have a purpose) and upgrading lowtech noise dampeners like carpets and curtains. Weyerhaeus­er, whose 1971 ecoheadqua­rters outside Seattle has been called the “original green building,” used plants as interior screens and sound baffles—just like the bars and restaurant­s of the era. Since then, techniques to keep the noise down have continuous­ly swung between personal tech and holistic hushing. By the 1990s, “hoteling,” the idea that workers would alight at the office only a few days a week, reigned supreme, and tent-inspired structures proliferat­ed. Clive Wilkinson, whose firm designed offices for Google and TBWA\Chiat\Day, provided ad agency Mother with a London location that was all concrete surfaces below and sound-absorbing Marimekko light fixtures above. Ayse Birsel’s 1997 Resolve system for Herman Miller included accessorie­s for personaliz­ation, as well as sound-dampening via sail-shaped rolling screens. “People modify their behavior,” HM’s Rick Duffy told Fast Company. “They lower their voices because they can see that other people are trying to work.” Today’s primary noisecance­ling technology shares a smooth white aesthetic with the original Acoustic Conditione­r as well as nomadism with the 1990s: the earbud, piping white noise or podcasts or the Spotify playlist of your choice directly into your ears. New intra-office communicat­ion platforms like Slack cut down on outloud conversati­ons, but a Google search reveals plenty of advice on how to “reduce noise in Slack.” Densificat­ion of offices has also propelled one of the stranger waves of “innovation” in recent memory: the room. Zenbooth and Thinktanks and, yes, ROOM offer glass-walled enclosures that look like ye olde mid-century private offices but with online sign-ups for time slots. Herman Miller was there first, too: The same year it introduced the Action Office, it also offered the “Super Room” for “totally assured acoustical and visual privacy.” When I visited the Thinktanks website, a pop-up asked, “How can I help you find the best Quiet Space for you?” All I could think was, I’ve already got it, right here at home.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States