New York Post

Pal$ probing Hynes

DA put donors on conviction-review panel

- By SELIM ALGAR selim.algar@nypost.com

Three members of a special “independen­t” panel set up by Brooklyn District Attorney Charles Hynes to review 50 of his office’s most controvers­ial conviction­s donated to his reelection campaign, records show.

Law professor Robert Keating provided $500, attorney Laura Brevetti kicked in $250, and retired Judge Joseph Bellacosa forked over $1,000 to Hynes, according to campaign filings.

Hynes is facing the most serious reelection challenge of his 24year career as Brooklyn’s top lawman.

“Does anyone really think these people are going to be objective when they are donating to his campaign?” said Pace University law professor and former prosecutor Bennett Gershman. “These are his friends, his cronies. I think it’s a serious question if they can be objective.”

The trio are part of a 12person panel Hynes created to probe conviction­s based on investigat­ive work by thenNYPD Detective Louis Scarcella, who allegedly used shady witnesses and forced confession­s to put people in the slammer.

While many of Scarcella’s cases preceded his tenure as DA, Hynes fought off appeals of his conviction­s for years before pressure for new investigat­ions became too great to ignore.

In March, Hynes’ own Conviction Integrity Unit tossed the Scarcellas­tained conviction of David Ranta for murdering a rabbi, freeing the printer after 23 years in prison.

Stunning revelation­s about Scarcella’s ugly tactics in that case, which went unquestion­ed by prosecutor­s at the time, led to the creation of Hynes’ new review panel.

Hynes campaign spokesman George Arzt insisted the panelists remain independen­t, despite their support for the man whose office they are charged with reviewing.

“These three prominent New Yorkers had distinguis­hed careers on the judiciary, and their integrity and objectivit­y is unquestion­ed,” he told The Post.

Hynes’ 40page donor list was filled with other potentiall­y questionab­le contributi­ons, including money given by relatives of sitting Brooklyn Supreme Court Judge Matthew D’Emic.

Records show that several relatives of the jurist contribute­d nearly $1,000 to reelect Hynes.

“That’s extremely troubling,” Gershman said. “Can you maintain a profession­al relationsh­ip in court between the prosecutor and the judge when there is money being donated?”

D’Emic would not comment when asked about the ethical implicatio­ns of the contributi­ons.

And the DA’s office has suffered several other recent setbacks.

Jabbar Collins — who spent 15 years in prison for the murder of a rabbi before a federal judge set him free, citing misconduct by Hynes’ staff — is suing the city for $150 million. And four men charged with raping and pimping a young Orthodox Jewish woman also saw the charges dropped in June 2012 after Brooklyn prosecutor­s failed to disclose that their accuser recanted her claims.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States