New York Post

A surge to merge Loud ’n’ proud

Malone weighs in on pay-TV deals

- By CLAIRE ATKINSON catkinson@nypost.com

Liberty Media boss John Malone said Monday he’s glad that Charter didn’t end up in a deal for all of Time Warner Cable.

Libertybac­ked Charter’s shareholde­rs are better off with only parts of the New Yorkheadqu­artered Time Warner Cable, he said.

Charter has a deal with Comcast to take over 3.9 million Time Warner Cable subscriber­s either directly or through management of a spinoff, should Comcast win government approval to acquire Time Warner Cable.

Speaking for a short time at the company’s annual shareholde­r meeting, Malone said that Charter “is in a beautiful position to reinitiate discussion­s with Time Warner Cable,” if the government blocks Comcast’s deal. Though he added: “That’s not something we expect.”

Liberty’s John Malone wonders if regulators shouldn’t set one big M-Day rather than do the media mergers one at a time.

Malone initiated a round of consolidat­ion late last year with a plan for Charter to scoop up Time Warner Cable in a hostile bid. The onetime “King of Cable,” however, lost out after Comcast CEO Brian Roberts swooped in and agreed to pay more.

Separately, Malone wondered how the FCC would deal with a slew of media-industry mergers currently on its books. They include AT&T’s $48.5 billion bid to acquire satellite operator DirecTV and a possible Sprint/TMobile combinatio­n.

He wondered if FCC chief Tom Wheeler would look at the payTV deals as three separate transactio­ns or consider them in tandem.

The FCC may also have to consider 21st Century Fox’s proposal to acquire Time Warner. Time Warner has rejected that bid.

It seems Malone and his sidekick, Greg Maffei, don’t view that consolidat­ion as great for their cable assets, which would likely pay more for cable programmin­g if the deal comes to fruition.

Libertaria­n Malone also got in a dig at the current administra­tion, suggesting that the complex web of Liberty-related stocks and spinoffs were “much more transparen­t that the Obama administra­tion.”

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States