New York Post

DRIP, DRIP, DRIP...

How the Clintons manage a scandal — by dribbling out the lies until people become tired or confused

- by JOHN PODHORETZ

While the presidenti­al news continues to revolve around the Donald Trump & Barnum & Bailey Circus, by far the most significan­t political fact of the summer that just ended was the air that has been steadily leaking from the Hillary Clinton balloon.

She no longer commands the support of a majority of Democrats. She’s 20 points down from her poll peak, and is now significan­tly trailing a 74yearold Socialist in the first primary state of New Hampshire. The most forbidding frontrunne­r in modern history has become just another frontrunne­r.

Yes, it’s all going according to plan — the Clinton plan.

If the plan works, she’ll come down to earth slowly and then be buoyed up again later on, as the lack of a truly acceptable alternativ­e becomes clearer. And, more important, as the tangle of potential problems surroundin­g her email system just keeps getting more and more confusing.

Hillary has spent the year seeing her reputation compromise­d by the dripdripdr­ip of scandal. But that dripdripdr­ip is deliberate. It’s a way of releasing damaging informatio­n in the least damaging way, and it’s been carefully designed by her and her team in response to various congressio­nal subpoenas and judicial orders.

They, and the administra­tion she served, are dribbling out informatio­n in a haphazard manner that is de signed to keep the drips from pooling together in a way that would eventually cause a flood.

Or, to try a different kind of elemental metaphor, there’s a lot of smoke but there’s no discernibl­e fire. And that’s entirely on purpose.

I follow these matters for a living, and by now I can’t make head or tail of where the Hillary email scandal is. Just in the last few days we learned that Hillary had been using the email server she had supposedly taken off line as recently as this year. So the wiped server wasn’t wiped. I think. And that’s bad. I think. But I can’t remember why, and if I can’t, nobody can.

Trying to assemble a coherent story from the informatio­n we have is like assembling a 1,000piece jigsaw puzzle that’s missing 700 pieces.

Neither Bill nor Hillary is the type to wish away trouble or pretend it doesn’t exist. More important, if I know my Bill and Hillary, I think they probably expected something like this would happen.

They must have always known she would have to slog her way through a series of scandals to get the nomination and win the presidency. Indeed, they may even have made calculatio­ns about how much risk they could take on when it came to their family foundation’s discomfiti­ng fundraisin­g practices and Hillary’s role as secretary of state.

They are realists, not fantasists, and they are well acquainted with the effort it takes to run a campaign with scandals nipping at your heels.

That was the story of Bill Clinton’s career, after all.

They must have known Hillary the Candidate would be brought down to earth after running 40 or 50 points ahead, in part because they must also have known what was going to bring her down to earth. It’s their Foundation, after all. Their joint life experience offers proof that a candidate can weather scandals and reputation­al slings and arrows that would take down most other people. Bill survived the Gennifer Flowers sex scandal to win the Democratic nomination in 1992 and the Whitewater financial scandal to win a second presidenti­al term in 1996.

In both cases, Hillary’s conduct was crucial to his survival and ultimate triumph. And Bill is surely attempting to return the favor by working to guide her through the brambles along her own path to the White House. So what’s the strategy here? First, scare serious rivals away. Her 5060 point lead in the polls throughout 2014 and early 2015 didn’t happen by accident. It was the result of a slow and steady quiet buildup that began from the moment she announced her departure from the State Department in 2013.

Recall that Barack Obama went on “60 Minutes” with her and essentiall­y endorsed her as his successor. That appearance didn’t just suggest, but shouted out, that the White House would look unfavorabl­y on any bid for the presidency by VP Joe Biden.

An open seat for the White House should have been contended by several major political figures. But it would have been nuts for anyone really serious to challenge Hillary when she was already enormously famous, sitting atop an unparallel­ed fundraisin­g machine and clearly willing to use hard knuckles if necessary against anyone who might deny her this last shot at the big brass ring.

Second, manage the scandal you know is coming. A Congressio­nal investigat­ion into her conduct during and after the US consulate in Benghazi was stormed in 2012 had been ongoing for two years before the State Department was forced to concede it did not possess tens of thousands of subpoenaed emails. Those emails were on a personal server Mrs. Clinton had set up just as she was beginning her tenure as secretary of state in 2009.

She knew those emails were under subpoena. She just didn’t let Congress know about the server. The informatio­n came out in late March 2015, by which time the window to begin a serious challenge to her had all but closed.

Since then, it’s all been drip drip drip, in classic Nixonian fashion — what Nixon lawyer John Dean called a “modified limited hangout.” First she said the server had been destroyed. Then she said it had been wiped clean. Now it appears it may not have been wiped clean, and that it probably wasn’t destroyed.

Third, keep lying. These are what is known, in technical parlance, as “lies.” But there isn’t a single big whopping lie (yet) that makes the entire pack comprehens­ible. It looks bad, and it smells bad, and everybody knows it. But not bad enough to cause a fullscale Democratic panic.

And if she can just keep it all at this dribbling level, the lack of clarity will continue. The bet here is that Congress and the Justice Department will never be able to fill in the jigsaw puzzle sufficient­ly to figure out the whole.

It’s the Clinton way. Worked before. Worth a try now. She’ll go into election day 2016 with close to 48% of the vote whatever happens — unless she’s indicted or in jail beforehand. And given the past, who’d bet on that?

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States