New York Post

How to pick your brackets

HOWIE KUSSOY IN SPORTS:

- By HOWIE KUSSOY hkussoy@nypost.com

There are certain constants in the NCAA Tournament: Nets will be cut, “One Shining Moment” will play and someone who hasn’t watched one full game this season will win your office pool.

In search of the eventual national champion, and a perfect bracket, we try to make sense of an event defined by chaos. We seek answers to the unpredicta­ble.

Over time, certain theories have formed as keys to NCAA Tournament success, but not all are created equal. So, let’s separate fact from aberration: A big-time coach is important to winning a title

FACT: Since 1990, the only coaches to win a national championsh­ip who aren’t in — or are headed to — the Hall of Fame are Jim Harrick (UCLA, 1995), Tubby Smith (Kentucky, 1998) and Kevin Ollie (Connecticu­t, 2011). A top-shelf program with elite talent can make up for the absence of an establishe­d leader, as Harrick, Smith and Ollie demonstrat­ed, but it doesn’t happen often. A conference tournament title leads to an NCAA Tournament title

FICTION: From 1998 to 2011, it seemed that way, with 10 national champions winning their conference tournament­s first. Since then, four of the past five NCAA Tournament winners lost right before the brackets were released. Louisville was the most recent team to accomplish the double feat, claiming the 2013 Big East Tournament title. North Carolina, Kansas, Louisville and UCLA remain as dangerous as they seemed one week ago. Experience matters

FICTION: Last year’s national championsh­ip game featured two teams led by seniors — Ryan Arcidiacon­o’s and Daniel Ochefu’s Villanova topping Brice Johnson’s and Marcus Paige’s North Carolina — but the proliferat­ion of college stars turning pro after a year or two has made veteran leadership a bonus, not a necessity. In 2015, Duke won the national title behind freshmen Tyus Jones, Jahlil Okafor and Justise Winslow, and Grayson Allen’s breakout performanc­e in the title game. In 2014, Kentucky started five freshmen and reached the national title game. In 2012, Anthony Davis and Michael Kidd-Gilchrist became champions at Kentucky. Ultimately, talent — like that of UCLA’s Lonzo Ball or Duke’s Jayson Tatum — matters most. Good guards are more valuable than good big men FACT: The slow death of post players, and a

series of new rules implemente­d to increase scoring and decrease physical play against ball-handlers, has certainly helped backcourt stars lead the charge. In the past decade, Anthony Davis is the only true big man to win the Most Outstandin­g Player of the Final Four, while seven guards have captured the award.

Defense wins championsh­ips

FICTION: Defense is essential, but not as much as an even stronger offense. The average national adjusted offensive efficiency ranking of the past 15 national champions is 7.5 — 10 title winners since 2002, and eight of the past 10 champions, have been ranked in the top-four in the country — while the average adjusted defensive efficiency is 8.9. None of those national championsh­ip defenses has been ranked worse than 21st (North Carolina, 2009), though several contenders this year could make that moot — North Carolina (fourthrank­ed offense, 25th-ranked defense), Duke (sixth-ranked offense, 39th-ranked defense), Kansas (ninth-ranked offense, 30th-ranked defense) and UCLA (third-ranked offense, 78th-ranked defense).

The First Four matters

FACT: Since the final at-large teams started being sent to Dayton in 2011, at least one team has won two games each year. Three teams have advanced as far as the Sweet 16, with VCU going from the First Four to the Final Four in 2011.

Always pick at least one 12-seed over a five-seed

FACT: Well, you should because your bracket would be pretty boring otherwise, but 12-seeds also have won 10 first-round games in the past five tournament­s, winning at least one game in 28 of the past 32 years. Pay just as much attention to 11-seeds, which are 15-13 against six-seeds in the past seven tournament­s, while a 14-seed has won in four straight tournament­s.

The top seeds won’t all reach the Final Four

FACT: It has only happened once before (2008), two fewer times than when no No. 1 overall seed has been at the Final Four. They will all advance to the second round, though, holding a 128-0 record against 16-seeds.

… Unless the most adhered-to advice finally reveals its first crack, too.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States