New York Post

THE DEPT. OF INVENTIONS

How a Pentagon arm spawned Siri, the Roomba, the Googlee car & even tthe ’Net

- By RON HOGAN

FOLLOWING the invasions of Afghanista­n and Iraq, US troops were embedded in areas where few, if any, of our soldiers spoke the language. The Defense Advanced Research Project Agency (DARPA), the research-and-developmen­t branch of the Department of Defense, had a solution: a “Star Trek”-esque device known as the Phraselato­r.

The handheld device, issued to some divisions in Afghanista­n in 2002, wasn’t a real-time translator. Instead, a soldier would hit a button, and the device would say it was going to ask questions in Pashto or Arabic and instruct the person to raise one hand for yes or two hands for no.

Unfortunat­ely, the yes-or-no answers weren’t much help, and Afghan leaders didn’t feel comfortabl­e talking to a machine. A 2009 Army survey universall­y panned the universal translator: “Took too long to translate the correct phrase,” soldiers said. “Translatio­n wrong more often than not.”

The Phraselato­r was dropped. DARPA cut off its outside research funding for the project, including its support of a company called SRI Internatio­nal. SRI spun off the technology as a separate entity called Siri, which was then bought by Apple and incorporat­ed into the iPhone.

IT’S a common refrain in Sharon Weinberger’s new history of the agency, “The Imagineers of War: The Untold Story of DARPA, the Pentagon Agency That Changed the World” (Knopf ).

While the agency didn’t always succeed in its primary mission — improving the US military — its influence is everywhere.

“DARPA’s work on natural language processing was not necessaril­y going to help soldiers talk to Afghans,” Weinberger writes, “but it could help Americans find the closest Starbucks.” Founded in 1958 in response to the Soviet launch of Sputnik, the Advanced Research Projects Agency (the “DD” was added in 1972) was also a pioneer in: GPS: DARPA was in charge of the first communicat­ions satellite and first spy satellite. It was involved in Transit, a satellite launched to help submarines navigate — leading to the Global Positionin­g System.

Driverless cars: Starting in 2004, DARPA sponsored robotic car races across the Mojave Desert. It offered a $1 million prize to the first car that could travel 150 miles across the desert between Barstow, Calif., and Primm, Nev. Unfortunat­ely, the best any car could do that year was 7.32 miles, but one year later, the Stanford Racing Team developed a car (left) that completed a 212-mile course in just under seven hours. The head of that team, Sebastian Thrun, went on to pioneer the developmen­t of Google’s self-driving car.

Stealth aircraft: DARPA had been working on invisible jets since the 1970s, starting with a prototype called Have Blue. The agency’s research laid the groundwork for aircraft today that can’t be seen by radar, such as the helicopter­s used in the Osama bin Laden raid.

Robotics: One of DARPA’s main areas of inquiry has been using robots in the battlefiel­d, such as PackBot, which was used to dispose bombs in Iraq and Afghanista­n. The PackBot was developed by the company iRobot using a DARPA grant. iRobot would go on to develop the robotic vacuum cleaner Roomba (right).ht).

BUT DARPA’s most famous contribu-bution was inventingn­g the Internet. (Sorry,y, Al Gore.) In the 1960s, DARPA sponsored the developmen­t of a system of networked comput-ers called the ARPA-NET.

J.C.R. Licklider, a re-research director at ARPA,PA, was fascinated by the ways computer operators’ “command and control” of their machines was evolving, and realized that people would use the devices to interact with one another across great distances. Though the Pentagon initially wanted a way to control its nuclear arsenal, Licklider had a bigger goal in mind, and ARPA gave him the opportunit­y to steer the research

on networked computing, awarding contracts to scientists at MIT, Stanford and other institutio­ns.

The effort almost fell apart within a year, though, as ARPA’s head, Robert Sproull, was looking for ways to cut $15 million from the agency’s budget. Licklider’s research hadn’t produced any concrete results, so it was a natural targetg — until Licklider invited SproullSpr­o to visit some of the computerpu­te labs and convinced him theirthei work would pay off in the long run. It did — ARPANET devveloped many of the protocols

thatth the Internet uses today. F ROM a purely military perspectiv­e, DARPA’s biggest success has been ddrones, which the agency has bebeen working on since the Vietnamnam War. WWith Project AGILE, the agenagency spent millions of dollars trying to develop counterins­urgency techniques to help the South Vietnamese government defeat the Viet Cong. One endeavor took a small drone helicopter developed by the Navy to drop nuclear bombs on Soviet submarines, added a TV camera, and installed the remote-control equipment in the back of a jeep. Then, they added a small gun and bombs. Although these drones tended to crash during test flights, and were never used in Vietnam, the project at least establishe­d that, in principle, drones could be viable in combat.

By 1980, DARPA had resumed its research into unmanned vehicles that could replace spy planes, working with a company called Leading Systems Incorporat­ed to develop a prototype. This drone, code-named Amber, could be used for reconnaiss­ance missions or as a cruise missile. After 10 years, however, the Pentagon refused to extend the program further. LSI went bankrupt and was sold to a defense contractor called General Atomics — at which point the CIA stepped in. With a few modificati­ons,ns, inincludin­g a significan­tly quieter engine, Amber evolved into the Predator drone, which both the CIA and the Air Force would use in Iraq, Afghanista­n, and elsewhere.

Project AGILE was also responsibl­e fore the agency’s darkest hour. ARPA’s Operation Ranch Hand tried to develop weapons that would kill people but leave crops and landscapes untouched. The result: Agent Orange, which not only killed Viet Cong, it caused illness and death for thousands of Vietnam veterans. A ND then there were the duds.

DARPA’s attempts to win the Vietnam War bordered on the absurd, like the proposal to relocate entire village population­s into “strategic hamlets,” walled communitie­s designed to kkeep out infiltrato­rs. Villagers wwere understand­ably opposed.

A nuclear-weapon shield during the Cold War proved particular­ly vexing. One proposal was to sshoot down Soviet ICBMs with a ccharged particle beam, which would be powered by draining the Great Lakes and running all tthat water through a massive generator. That idea got kicked around for at least a decade, though almost nobody ever expected it to work, mainly because it seemed to keep scientists’ creaative juices flowing.

In the 1970s, DARPA psychologi­st George Lawrence explored the possibilit­ies of biofeedbac­k ttraining: What if combat soldiers ccould be taught to slow their own heartbeats after getting shot, to reduce the odds of bleeding out? What if fighter pilots could willfully maintain low blood pressure in emergency situations? Lawrence eventually decided the training would be too much work for insufficie­nt results, but along tthe way he was asked to look into a CIA-funded project testing Uri Geller, famous in those days for hhis claims of an array of psychic ppowers.

Lawrence flew out to Californni­a, showed up at the Stanford Research Institute (SRI) looking heavily hung over, and declared, “OK, show me a f- -king miracle.” But Geller never let the team test him under truly scientific conditions.

As another witness described it, the SRI researcher­s, who were inclined to believe Geller’s claims, came across as “bumbling idiots.” Lawrence grew increasing­ly frustrated. At one point, Geller claimed he had moved a compass needle with his mind; Lawrence stomped his foot on the floor and made the needle move much farther.

Much later, asked to give his appraisal of the CIA’s parapsycho­logy research, Lawrence was blunt: “You have been wasting your money. Every damn dime of this is nonsense.nonsense.”

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? TECH TALK: The Phraselato­r (opposite) — a handheld device designed to help US soldiers communicat­e in Arabic and Pashto in Iraq and Afghanista­n — was panned by those who tested it, but it became the technology behind the iPhone’s Siri (right).
TECH TALK: The Phraselato­r (opposite) — a handheld device designed to help US soldiers communicat­e in Arabic and Pashto in Iraq and Afghanista­n — was panned by those who tested it, but it became the technology behind the iPhone’s Siri (right).
 ??  ?? KINDA LOOKS LIKE A ‘WEB’: This 1969 diagram charts out a computer network called ARPANET – the protocols of which allowed for the creation of the Internet.
KINDA LOOKS LIKE A ‘WEB’: This 1969 diagram charts out a computer network called ARPANET – the protocols of which allowed for the creation of the Internet.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States