New York Post

Unbalanced book

Omissions mar Doctoroff’s WTC tome

- STEVE CUOZZO

DANIEL L. Doctoroff, former Mayor Mike

Bloomberg’s deputy mayor for economic developmen­t, can justly claim credit for many land-use initiative­s that helped lift the city out of its post-9/11 malaise.

But a crucial chapter in his new book, “Greater Than Ever: New York’s Big Comeback,” is more a maliciousl­y skewed attack on

Larry Silverstei­n than it is a credible account of World Trade Center rebuilding.

In the chapter “Ground Zero Unstuck,” Doctoroff depicts himself as the hero who kick-started redevelopm­ent after years of inertia — and Silverstei­n as the main obstacle to it.

Doctoroff absolutely helped the rebuilding cause by pushing a 2006 agreement whereby overburden­ed Silverstei­n turned rights to developing One World Trade Center over to the Port Authority.

But in Doctoroff ’s telling, Silverstei­n was a greedy obstructio­nist concerned only with milking every cent he could out of his insurers. But while Silverstei­n may have some things to answer

for during the drawn-out drama, so does every other player and party to it — including especially Doctoroff and Bloomberg.

“Ground Zero Unstuck” does not even mention:

That Silverstei­n was paying the Port Authority $80 million a year in ground rent on buildings that no longer existed. Maybe he had cause to be hard-nosed?

That the PA failed to start excavating the 16-acre site to make it constructi­onready for four long years after 2002, then dragged its heels on the job for three years more. Silverstei­n could not build so much as a birdhouse until the work was finished.

The PA paid Silverstei­n a total $64 million in fines for failing to turn over the land to him under a contractua­lly specified timetable. How could Doctoroff

leave out so essential a fact?

That before the 2006 site-splitting deal, Silverstei­n had already completed Seven World Trade Center — a magnificen­t project that disproved the notion that he was a wheel-spinner who wouldn’t risk a dime.

He put the 47-story skyscraper up without a single tenant signed.

Although insurance proceeds and tax-exempt Liberty Bond financing helped pay for constructi­on, the tower was still a huge risk for Silverstei­n. Failure would have doomed his future at the main WTC site and cost him a fortune in the long run.

How did City Hall greet 7 WTC, a powerful symbol of downtown regenerati­on? Bloomberg griped that Silverstei­n, who wanted $50 a square foot, should “reduce his rents to the going rate” of $35 a square foot in obsoles- cent buildings nearby. Silverstei­n swiftly found higherpayi­ng tenants to fill the whole tower.

Throughout the chapter, Doctoroff would have us believe that only he could keep Silverstei­n honest about how much money he had to rebuild and what it would cost.

Doctoroff relates that in 2005, he got Lehman Bros. to analyze how much it would cost to replace all 10 million square feet of offices destroyed on 9/11 — and Lehman’s “jaw-dropping” $7.5 billion estimate was far higher than anyone knew.

But Doctoroff apparently missed a story in The New York Post by William Neuman on Jan. 30, 2004, which reported the exact same $7.5 billion figure.

The estimate was prepared by Tishman Constructi­on — for none other than Silverstei­n himself.

 ??  ?? In his new book (inset), Dan Doctoroff gives himself too much credit for WTC’s redevelopm­ent and unfairly paints real estate developer Larry Silverstei­n as a greedy obstructio­nist, according to The Post’s Steve Cuozzo. Dan Doctoroff served as deputy...
In his new book (inset), Dan Doctoroff gives himself too much credit for WTC’s redevelopm­ent and unfairly paints real estate developer Larry Silverstei­n as a greedy obstructio­nist, according to The Post’s Steve Cuozzo. Dan Doctoroff served as deputy...
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States