New York Post

What a Waste

Everyone knew acquittal was inevitable

- JOSH HAMMER

AFTER months of hype and pseudo-drama ginned up by the left, public and secret testimony and breathless “smoking-gun” headlines, it’s taking the Senate just two weeks to bring an end, finally, to the impeachmen­t circus. And it is ending with the always-inevitable acquittal of President Trump.

What a tragic, monumental waste of time it has been. After all, anyone capable of rudimentar­y arithmetic could have seen this foreordain­ed outcome coming from Day One.

Indeed, it’s not entirely clear why House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and the rest of the leading luminaries of the Democratic Party even decided to embark upon this national exercise in political self-flagellati­on. Math is a stubborn thing, and Democrats constitute a Senate minority — a far cry from the two-thirds supermajor­ity required for conviction under Article I of the Constituti­on.

It is true, of course, that many on the left have been juiced up by an all-encompassi­ng impeachmen­t fervor since the day President Trump was inaugurate­d. Who can forget the infamous Washington Post headline from Inaugurati­on Day 2017: “The campaign to impeach President Trump has begun.”

But impeach him for this? Really?

Democrats clearly resorted to this tepid, half-hearted effort after special counsel Robert Mueller failed to deliver the goods on Russiagate. No rational observer can earnestly believe that a sober reading of the July 25 phone call between Trump and Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky — the allegedly nefarious transcript that takes up all of a whopping five pages — actually amounts to an impeachabl­e offense.

Hook up Adam Schiff and Jerry Nadler to a polygraph and they may well admit as much. But after Mueller struck out, Pelosi needed some sort of grist to appease Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and the rest of the crazy farleft caucus.

Alas, to call it a mere waste of time is likely far too charitable. The Democrats took stock of the decrepit state of our national politics, the bitterly fractious nature of our partisan tribalism, the pathetic regard the American people have for their Congress and took a sledgehamm­er to it all. The most immediate tangible result of this failed gambit will be to only further coarsen and debase our politics.

The trials and tribulatio­ns of Hunter Biden will now become an even more regular fixture of the Democratic presidenti­al primary commentari­at. And if Uncle Joe is the nominee, we won’t stop hearing about Hunter Biden throughout the general election, either. It’s tough to see how anyone could see that as healthy for the republic.

Whatever political damage Democrats think they have done to the president, furthermor­e, it is more than countered by the way this stunt has galvanized the president’s core supporters to rally to his side. There is no reliable polling showing that impeachmen­t is a net political winner for Democrats.

At best for the Dems, we are right back to where we started. At worst for them, while national polling is more divided, there is a surplus of polling across key Rust Belt swing states to suggest that impeachmen­t will likely redound to Republican­s’ electoral interests in November.

Most damaging of all, the Democrats’ pursuit of the draconian remedy of impeachmen­t based on their claims of Trump’s corrupt subjective intentions on a diplomatic phone call has set a truly reckless precedent for the future. The general conduct of foreign policy is a core Article II function constituti­onally vested in the president, and soliciting a “quid pro quo” while acting lawfully amounts to constituti­onally protected free speech.

For Democrats to argue that Trump’s purportedl­y corrupt motive somehow transmogri­fies such constituti­onally protected conduct into an impeachabl­e offense is nothing short of astonishin­g. Their zeal to impeach for what amounts to a policy disagreeme­nt over a diplomatic phone call reeks of the “maladminis­tration” impeachmen­t standard the Framers deliberate­d and then conscienti­ously rejected at the 1787 constituti­onal convention.

Democrats have now undermined the solemnity of the impeachmen­t process and laid the foundation for future debilitati­ng impeachmen­ts whenever different political parties control the House and the presidency.

Lackluster television ratings indicate that the vast majority of Americans tuned out much of the Pelosi-Schumer impeachmen­t show. Good for them. But it is now time to move past this unfortunat­e affair and limit the fallout as much as possible.

 ??  ?? What were they thinking? Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi’s tepid, half-hearted impeachmen­t case did the nation a huge disservice.
What were they thinking? Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi’s tepid, half-hearted impeachmen­t case did the nation a huge disservice.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States