New York Post

Cohen has had a worse 1st year in Citi than Lindor

- Ian O’Connor ioconnor@nypost.com

STEVE Cohen did not love his ravioli dish, but his springtime dinner with Francisco Lindor was still supposed to change everything about the Mets. The goodwill establishe­d that night ultimately helped make a $341 million deal that Fred Wilpon never would have made, with or without his Madoff money. Nearly six months later, after Sunday night’s too-little, too-late victory over Philadelph­ia broke a lethal five-game losing streak, Lindor stands as the most prominent face of the latest Mets season gone awry. Michael Conforto and Jeff McNeil are up there on the list of primary culprits, but they are not superstars making superstar money. So more than anybody, the shortstop will wear this one. The owner, too.

In fact, Steve Cohen has had a more disappoint­ing season than his highestpai­d player has had. Lindor was brand new to the franchise and to the market, and was almost bound to struggle at the plate and to engage in some clueless conduct — lying comically about his tussle with McNeil, thumbing his nose at the fans by giving them the thumbs-down — as he adjusted to the big city.

But Cohen is a lifelong New Yorker and Mets fan who had spent more than eight years in the organizati­on as a minority owner. He had closely watched the Wilpons, Fred and Jeff, make all their mistakes, before buying their team for $2.4 billion. And when Cohen promised that his operation would be defined by profession­alism and integrity, and that he was “not gonna put up with maybe the type of stuff that has happened in other places,” it sounded like code for, I’m not gonna put up with the type of stuff that happened in this place, under Fred and Jeff.

Feeling liberated at last, Mets fans ate it up. No recent American owner had received a more enthusiast­ic welcome than Cohen, a hedge-fund zillionair­e who spoke confidentl­y of making the playoffs this fall, fielding a consistent­ly great team, and winning a World Series within three to five years. And then Cohen rained on his own parade.

Actually, it wasn’t so much what the owner did, but what the people he hired did, or didn’t do, in trying to establish that winning culture sports executives are forever talking about. Cohen brought back Sandy Alderson, who in turn brought in Jared Porter, as GM, and Zack Scott, as assistant GM. The Mets fired Porter the month after he was hired for sending explicit and harassing texts to a female reporter in 2016, while working for the Cubs, and then sidelined his replacemen­t, Scott, earlier this month after he was charged with DWI. (Scott pleaded not guilty.)

But before his arrest, Scott exposed a different flaw in Cohen’s culture when he said Mets players who landed on the injury list were not compliant in following injury prevention protocols. In other words, the players were ignoring the team’s instructio­ns on how to remain healthy.

In the big leagues, it’s hard to get more dysfunctio­nal than that.

The players’ same apparent disregard for their employer showed up again during the thumbs-down fiasco. When underperfo­rming pro athletes feel free to mock paying customers who are rightfully expressing their displeasur­e, they show no fear of, or respect for, the accountabi­lity their boss supposedly demands.

Cohen, or Cohen’s people, committed a long series of unforced errors during the season, including the disastrous drafting of Vanderbilt’s Kumar Rocker, and the owner’s penchant for thinking aloud on Twitter. Though he was right when firing a jagged-edge tweet at his hopeless hitters, his decision to turn Post beat writer Mike Puma’s story on the owner’s social media presence and management style — and how they could compromise the search for a baseball operations chief — into a name-that-source contest only served to make Puma’s point.

What do you suppose Billy Beane and Theo Epstein thought about Cohen’s amateur-hour exercise on Twitter? Exactly.

A quick review of Cohen’s opening press conference as Mets owner reminds that he didn’t deliver on any of his stated goals. He said he would hire “the best and the brightest.” He said he wanted to “create a blueprint for winning” and keep the players healthy. He said he wanted the fans’ experience to be “extraordin­ary.” He said he wanted to borrow from the Dodgers’ program but also develop “the Mets’ way with a Mets culture, which is going to be uniquely ours.”

Yes, Cohen deserves a fair chance to recover in the coming seasons, as does Lindor. But given the owner’s experience with the organizati­on and the market, Lindor had a better excuse to fail than his boss did.

And yet Cohen failed anyway. After he bought the Mets he said, “I’m not crazy about people learning on my dime.”

Mets fans weren’t crazy about Cohen learning on their dime either.

 ?? Corey Sipkin ?? OWN PROBLEMS: In many ways, Mets owner Steve Cohen has had a far more disappoint­ing season than his highest-paid player, Francisco Lindor, who went 1-for-4 on Sunday, writes The Post’s Ian O’Connor.
Corey Sipkin OWN PROBLEMS: In many ways, Mets owner Steve Cohen has had a far more disappoint­ing season than his highest-paid player, Francisco Lindor, who went 1-for-4 on Sunday, writes The Post’s Ian O’Connor.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States