New York Post

Killing Democracy In Order To ‘Save’ It

- rich lowry Twitter: @RichLowry

ON Jan. 6, 2021, rioters seeking to disrupt the counting of electoral votes breached the US Capitol and rampaged for a few hours before order was restored. This was a disgracefu­l spectacle that shouldn’t be repeated, and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer knows just what is needed to respond to the moment — passing every progressiv­e voting-related priority that can possibly be jammed through the Senate on an extremely narrow, partisan vote.

The defense of our democracy, Schumer maintains, demands nothing less.

The latest pitch for the Democratic voting agenda is more cynical and detached from reality than ever. We are to believe that the only way to counteract the furies unleashed on Jan. 6 is by imposing same-day voter registrati­on and no-excuse mail voting on the\ states, ending partisan gerrymande­ring and requiring the counting of ballots that arrive up to seven days after Election Day, among other provisions completely irrelevant to events that day or afterward.

If you’re thinking that Democrats supported all this on Jan. 5 of last year and still supported it on Jan. 7, you’re correct.

Their agenda has as much to do with Jan. 6 as an annual appropriat­ions bill or the naming of a post office.

The Democratic drive to nationaliz­e our elections has always been a sweepingly radical step in search of an alleged crisis to address. When a version was first introduced a few years ago, it was sold as addressing “the vile voter suppressio­n practices” of the GOP, in the words of the New York Times.

The big lie of the time was that the Georgia gubernator­ial campaign of Stacey Abrams in 2018 was undone by such practices. Now, the justificat­ion is the Capitol riot and subsequent GOP statelevel voting changes that have been portrayed, falsely, as the return of Jim Crow.

In reality, voting has never been easier, and voters have never had so many options for how to participat­e in elections — whether early in-person voting, traditiona­l same-day voting or mail-in voting. There are partisan disputes about how to strike a balance between convenienc­e and security, but there is no reason that these difference­s can’t be debated at the state level, with the balance struck differentl­y depending on the policy preference­s of elected officials in each state.

Limits on drop boxes or measures to tighten up the identifica­tion requiremen­ts around mail-in ballots aren’t suppressin­g the vote. The weakness of the system that was highlighte­d on Jan. 6 last year is the poorly drafted Electoral Count Act. It should be revised to make it explicit that the vice president can’t decide which electoral votes to count and that states can’t discard the popular vote if the outcome isn’t to their liking.

Even though changes along these lines might get bipartisan support, Schumer is pushing to eliminate the filibuster to pass the progressiv­e wish list of electoral non sequiturs (although a few provisions, like prohibitin­g the intimidati­on of election officials, have been added to the Democratic package to address the 2020 post-election fight).

To wrap this push in the bloody shirt of Jan. 6 is opportunis­tic and irresponsi­ble and can only serve to convince even more Republican­s that the outrage over that day is in the service of a nakedly partisan agenda.

Schumer has an uphill climb to persuade relatively moderate Democrats Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema to go along with kneecappin­g the filibuster. If the New York senator were to succeed, he will have blown a hole in the traditiona­l practices of the Senate and set the precedent for Republican­s — should they achieve unified control of Washington in 2024 — to impose all

their favored electoral policies on the states.

This yin and yang wouldn’t do anything to restore faith in democracy; rather the opposite. But Chuck Schumer is on a mission to achieve, and to use, the power to rewrite the country’s electoral rules — justificat­ions and consequenc­es be damned.

If you’re thinking that Democrats supported all this on Jan. 5 of last year and still supported it on Jan. 7, you’re correct.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States