New York Post

A Terror-Lawyer Giveaway

-

President Biden can’t touch anything without having it turn to disaster, and that, alas, is the case with billions in previously frozen Afghan funds meant to compensate terror victims and their loved ones.

In a February executive order, Biden effectivel­y confiscate­d $7 billion of those funds, which had been sitting in US banks, and directed half for Afghan aid and half for US victims of terror.

The Taliban’s role in 9/11 and the 1998 bombings of US embassies in Africa justify any move to keep the money out of their hands, but Biden’s order limits the pool of terror victims who’d benefit from their $3.5 billion half to only those who already had claims on the cash — about 150 people (and possibly some insurers that promise to distribute funds to other victims). That leaves out thousands of others who suffered in 9/11 and other attacks, rewarding only those who got to the courthouse early.

A legal battle has erupted between victims over the pot, an ugly turn given the horrors these people have already endured. Congress sought to avoid just such a nightmare, and to ensure all terror victims are treated fairly, when it set up the US Victims of State Sponsored Terrorism Fund in 2015. Yet Biden’s order bypasses that fund, leaving just the lucky (politicall­y connected?) few to benefit.

And get this: Fees to lawyers who help victims get compensati­on from the VSST Fund are capped at 15%, while attorneys who serve as go-betweens on Biden’s funds get up to 33% — more than $1 billion. Notably, one of the lawyers repping the lucky victims, Lee Wolosky, worked for Team Biden on Afghan matters until just days before quitting and taking them on as clients.

“The White House’s apparent desire to avoid the establishe­d VSST Fund process, the steering of the assets to plaintiffs represente­d by a recently-departed White House official and the sheer amount of money at issue raise considerab­le questions about President Biden’s order” — creating “at the very least” a perception of “impropriet­y,” charge GOP Reps. Jim Jordan (Ohio), Nicole Malliotaki­s (NY) and Mike Johnson (La.) in a letter to the White House.

Biden could fix the problem and avoid favoritism by simply amending his order and directing the $3.5 billion to the VSST, where it can be doled out to all terror victims equitably while also saving on lawyers’ fees. If he doesn’t, Congress should legislate such a move, over the prez’s veto if necessary.

Terror attacks on individual Americans are attacks on the entire nation, which thus has a moral obligation to provide whatever compensati­on it can. But fairly — not by picking a select few to reward while neglecting thousands of others.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States