New York Post

ONE OF A KIND

Scully best there was, but wouldn't get hired now

- Phil Mushnick

PRIOR to Vin Scully’s death on Tuesday at 94, I’d several times written that the state of sports broadcasti­ng in the unsteady hands of those who do the hiring today would relegate Scully to a long shot to be hired to call any team’s games.

Scully didn’t meet the current standards. He avoided gimmicks, hype, signature calls, forced belly laughs, endless stats and hollering over nothing.

He also could distinguis­h between radio and TV assignment­s, thus he famously knew when to speak and when to allow the pictures to be worth all the words.

That’s why Scully may be the only voice of any sport to be cherished for what he didn’t say.

And he much preferred to work alone. Just you and Vin at a baseball game. West Coast baseball fans often called it “a bond.”

Poor Johnny Bench was assigned to call four World Series with Scully on CBS Radio, 1990-93. Nothing personal, but Scully felt Bench’s presence to be just “big-name” superfluou­s, thus they produced the betweenpit­ches sounds of awkward.

It was baffling to hear Michael Kay, during YES’s Mariners-Yankees on Wednesday, recall Scully, a fellow Fordham and school radio station WFUV alum, as the best. Prior to Scully’s passing, it was equally odd to read that John Sterling idolized Scully.

Kay and Sterling have been career-reliant on word gimmickry and “signature calls,” sustaining them even as they’ve grown repetitive, old, tired and a counterpro­ductive exercise in foolish and stubborn self-deference.

In Sterling’s case, his long career has been slathered in selfsmitte­n signature calls so often dead wrong they’ve become lampooned as unintended farce.

So why would Kay and Sterling choose to be antithetic­al to Scully, if they most admired his style?

A gracious man — on Dodgers stationery, he’d hand-write a thank you for every admiration he read here — I was once privileged, or just an invited eavesdropp­er, to hear Scully at his angriest, as he couldn’t have possibly been angrier.

This was after Detroit won the fifth and last game of the 1984 Tigers-Padres World Series, the last Series to include a day game.

Shucks, nearly 40 years ago.

Scully, who called the Series for NBC, was asked to call after that game in Detroit.

As we began speaking, Scully noticed that a riot had erupted below him, just outside Tiger Stadium. He then gave me, the sole person in his audience, the playby-play: fires being set, a taxi overturned and burned, destructiv­e mobs on the march — all gathered and inspired by the last out of the Series.

Scully seethed, livid at the senselessn­ess of it all, disgusted that baseball would serve as fools’ fuel. He didn’t cuss, but yikes, was he angry.

He was also an unapologet­ic patriot. At a 2017 symposium, he was asked how he felt about NFL national anthem knee-takers. He said he was disgusted by them, said he’d never watch another NFL game. He had the audacity to protest the protesters.

He was soon ridiculed and dismissed as an “Old Retired White Man” on a popular but reckless, often dishonest and vulgar sports website featuring cheap-shot artists who made bad guesses to mischaract­erize and defame. That’s how to succeed in modern media business without really trying.

And Scully wasn’t shy to note that the country was in illogical decline.

Still, New Yorkers in Scully’s postBrookl­yn years among the 67 — sixty-seven! — he spent calling Dodgers games, still point to his Game 6 call of the unfathomab­le Red SoxMets World Series. The call?

After a perfect delivery of the play-by-play, there was none.

Only a sustained, glorious silence. He allowed NBC cameras to capture the extraordin­ary. Scully didn’t try to apply his historical stamp. He was so in-tune and on-time with every game he called that here he’s best remembered and revered for saying nothing!

He didn’t waste his wind trying to sell cheap thrills to audiences that knew better. Few current TV and radio executives would find that acceptable. Vin Scully would be disqualifi­ed.

 ?? ??
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States