New York Post

End the ‘Right to Shelter’

-

With the shelter system at “its breaking point” trying to handle thousands of illegal migrants arriving daily, Mayor Adams oh-so-rightly said that it’s time to “reassess” the city’s “right to shelter” policy. Darn straight.

Fact is, the policy — and the underlying consent decree dating back to the Ed Koch years — should’ve gone out the window decades ago, along with a host of other court-enforced deals that give self-appointed “advocates” power over city government.

Fact is, the 1981 Callahan decree, which created a right to temporary shelter, has spawned a multibilli­on industry with no end to homelessne­ss, the problem it supposedly targeted, in sight. A reality check is long overdue.

But that requires a court fight: Consent decrees settle lawsuits against the city by ceding power to a judge potentiall­y forever — sidelining not only the mayor and City Council, but also the voters who elect them.

And decrees often wind up costing a fortune, year after year, decade after decade.

The Callahan decree is a prime example. Over the past four decades, it has spawned a multibilli­on municipal enterprise enriching private and nonprofit profiteers (all too many of them, pretty unsavory). And since the migrant crisis arrived at City Hall’s doorstep, homeless advocates have played a constant game of “gotcha” with the administra­tion over people sleeping overnight at intake centers (instead of in nonexisten­t shelter beds).

To his credit, Adams said the city is “not stopping at the bare minimum” of reexaminin­g the right to shelter. “We’re going beyond that to make sure people have a right to a decent life here in our city.”

To that end, the city is enrolling migrant kids in public schools, giving the adults IDNYC cards and pressing for temporary work authorizat­ions for the migrants.

That is, the city’s not looking to abandon migrants or the regular homeless to their own devices — but it does want to rethink its approach without getting the advocates’, or the courts’, approval for every change.

The first step is directing new Corporatio­n Counsel Sylvia Hinds-Radix to notify the court of the need to reopen Callahan, with an eye on terminatin­g it. Getting there will require a brutal legal and political battle, but it’s a fight to restore democratic governance and commence discussion­s to reassess and revise the right-to-shelter consent decree. Reform is long overdue. We encourage Adams to follow through on his instincts.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States