New York Post

Watched list

Report: Those critical of Knicks targeted with facial recognitio­n at Dolan’s Garden

- By PETER BOTTE

James Dolan’s facial-recognitio­n penalties aren’t just reserved for lawyers involved in active litigation against him or Madison Square Garden and its subsidiari­es, but they reportedly also affect fans — and even celebritie­s — critical of the Knicks and Rangers owner on social media.

A week after The Post reported that a mother was denied entrance into Radio City Music Hall to see the Rockettes because her law firm was on an attorney exclusion list, a separate report published Thursday detailed how people allegedly encountere­d similar problems with MSG security for being publicly critical of Dolan, including one individual who simply told him to “sell the team” online.

Further, the Garden uses a tiered penalty system to differenti­ate offenders, according to sources cited in a report by Ethan Strauss on Substack.

For instance, Merrill Lynch financial adviser Brett Klein claims in the Substack report how he regularly gets flagged via facial recognitio­n software and is harassed at Knicks and Rangers games by security after once commenting “sell the team” on the Facebook page for Dolan’s band, JD & The Straight Shot. Klein added how he has received warnings from MSG security at least 10 separate times.

Knicks legend Charles Oakley infamously was ejected from a game at the Garden by security and arrested in 2017, while film director and Knicks megafan Spike Lee was denied entry via a Garden employee entrance in 2020, replying in part, “Are you going to treat me like Charles Oakley?”

According to the Substack report, Lee is still included on the arena’s Code of Conduct list as a Code 2 offender among a six-category tier, which ranges from zero to five. Code 2 is described as “we know you’re in the building at all times.”

“Spike Lee is a Code 2, because he’s rarely approached. He might have had a Code 3 status but for [a] publicized standoff with security over his choice of entrance, which generated bad press for the Knicks,” the story states. “When Lee does arrive, MSG’s security team tracks Lee’s every movement with their facial recognitio­n system, per Dolan’s preference­s for where Spike shouldn’t be allowed.

“Due to offense taken at Lee’s public comments, Dolan doesn’t want the director ‘back of the house,’ according to a source.”

In the cited MSG code system, a Code 0 offender is not to be admitted to the building at a given event and a Code 5 is described as a permanent ban.

Code 1 is designated for VIPs, the only positive rating on the list. Code 3 is described as security needing to have “a conversati­on with [the] person letting them know they know they’re in the building.” This appears to be Klein’s category, based on his apparent descriptio­n. Code 4 is stated as the need for “a conversati­on letting them know what they did is not tolerated and not accepted.”

Actor and outspoken Knicks fan Michael Rapaport was reported to be a Code 5 designatio­n, fully banned from the property over his criticism of Dolan.

“Rapaport is a 5. He’s banned. He’s going to be approached by senior leadership. Pretty much, his case would be a director or above,” a source said in the story. “Now, the way they do it, they have lawyers that attend every event in every venue, not the clubs, just the venues, Beacon Theater, Radio City, and the Arena. They would have the conversati­on, too. He would also be approached with a cop, to kind of lock his ass up for trespassin­g if he did try to put up a fight.”

An MSG spokespers­on said, “This is written by an unqualifie­d blogger with multiple inaccuraci­es and incorrect facts.”

 ?? ?? FACE FOR IMPACT: James Dolan’s Madison Square Garden is using facial recognitio­n to watch fans — including celebritie­s like Spike Lee (left) and Michael Rapaport (right) — who have been critical of the team.
FACE FOR IMPACT: James Dolan’s Madison Square Garden is using facial recognitio­n to watch fans — including celebritie­s like Spike Lee (left) and Michael Rapaport (right) — who have been critical of the team.
 ?? ??
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States