New York Post

1st son’s latest rebrand is just smoke & errors

- JONATHAN TURLEY Jonathan Turley is an attorney and a professor at George Washington University Law School.

WELCOME to the latest Hunter Biden reboot. Call it Dark Biden rises.

Hunter has long been a reclamatio­n project for the media and the Biden team. Despite ample evidence that he and his family may have engaged in one of the largest influence-peddling operations in history, the media have struggled to find a redeeming image for someone who’s committed his life to a toxic mix of nepotism, narcissism and narcotics.

First there was “Hunter: the wrongly accused internatio­nal businessma­n.” This blanket denial of wrongdoing was maintained by his father and dutifully repeated by the media. Hunter Biden did “nothing wrong,” and reporters pressing questions of corruption were immediatel­y attacked.

Kid chameleon

Then came “Hunter Biden: victim of Russian disinforma­tion.” Before the 2020 election, the media repeated the false claim that the Hunter laptop was likely “Russian disinforma­tion.” Despite the denial of American intelligen­ce and selfverify­ing emails on the laptop, the media accepted without question the dubious claims of former intelligen­ce figures pushed by longtime Democratic operatives.

Then it was “Hunter Biden: heroic recovering addict.” As the media denials became more difficult to maintain, Biden released a book that detailed his struggle with drugs and debauchery. The media again launched into the same fawning, unquestion­ing mode.

Now we have the Dark Biden. Hunter’s handlers are reinventin­g Hunter in a more menacing image. He is an edgy and aggressive antagonist ready to fight fire with fire against Republican­s.

A team was assembled to reportedly attack potential witnesses and critics. With a possible criminal indictment and congressio­nal investigat­ions looming, Hunter the wronged businessma­n or Russian victim or recovering addict will not do.

Hunter appears to have acquired lawyers by the gross, including highprofil­e lawyer Abbe Lowell. Lowell recently sent out a letter that caused a stir by not only confirming the authentici­ty of the laptop but threatenin­g a host of critics.

Lowell categorica­lly refused to turn over a single document to House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer (R-Ky.), saying there was no “legitimate legislativ­e purpose” for the investigat­ion. He left open the possibilit­y the House might convince Hunter to cooperate.

It’s all bravado and the posturing will be even less credible in the future when he backs down. Congress clearly has a legitimate interest in investigat­ing whether millions of dollars from foreign interests, including some connected to foreign intelligen­ce, were funneled to the Biden family to influence President Biden.

Emails repeatedly reference Joe Biden and suggest knowledge of the dealings despite his repeated denials. There is also a clear effort to hide Joe’s involvemen­t. In one email, Biden associate James Gilliar instructed Tony Bobulinski, then Hunter’s business partner: “Don’t mention Joe being involved, it’s only when u [sic] are face to face, I know u [sic] know that but they are paranoid.”

Cracked the code

Emails used code names for Joe Biden such as “Celtic” or “the big guy.” In one, “the big guy” is mentioned as possibly receiving a 10% cut on a deal with a Chinese energy firm.

The new Dark Biden is a bluff and the committee just called it. Unless Lowell backs down and hands over documents, he will follow the same strategy of Steve Bannon, who was ultimately charged with contempt and convicted.

Despite the considerab­le risk, Hunter is keeping to his new character. He has not shared informatio­n on his art sales. Now his art dealer, Georges Bergès, has also reportedly refused to provide the House Oversight Committee with identities of the buyers.

It won’t work. Indeed, it is a strategy that could lead to a criminal charge entirely separate from the underlying allegation­s. It just shows, as Joker stated in “The Dark Knight,” “Madness . . . is a lot like gravity. All it takes is a little push.”

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States