THIS ONE HITS ‘HOME’
Fed mortgage-rule change punishes good credit
A little-noticed revamp of federal rules on mortgage fees will offer discounted rates for homebuyers with riskier credit backgrounds — and force higher-credit homebuyers to foot the bill, The Post has learned.
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will enact changes to fees known as loan-level price adjustments (LLPAs) on May 1 that will affect mortgages originating at private banks nationwide, from Wells Fargo to JPMorgan Chase, effectively tweaking interest rates paid by the vast majority of homebuyers.
The result, according to industry pros: pricier monthly mortgage payments for most homebuyers — an ugly surprise for those who worked for years to build their credit, only to face higher costs than they expected as part of a housing affordability push by the US Federal Housing Finance Agency.
“It’s going to be a challenge trying to explain to somebody that says, ‘I worked my whole life for high credit and I’ve put a lot of money down and you’re telling me that’s a negative now?’ That’s a hard conversation to have,” one worried Arizona-based mortgage loan originator told The Post.
Bad to worse
“It’s unprecedented,” added David Stevens, who served as Federal Housing Administration commissioner during the Obama administration. “My email is full from mortgage companies and CEOs [telling] me how unbelievably shocked they are by this move.”
The tweaks could further complicate the strenuous mortgage application process and add more pressure on a core segment of buyers in a housing market already in the midst of a major downturn, the experts added. The average 30-year mortgage rate is hovering at 6.27% as of last week — up from about 5% one year ago and more than twice as high as it was two years ago, according to Freddie Mac data.
Under the new rules, high-credit buyers with scores ranging from 680 to above 780 will see a spike in their mortgage costs — with applicants who place a down payment of 15% to 20% experiencing the biggest increase in fees.
“This was a blatant and significant cut of fees for their highest-risk borrowers and a clear increase in much better credit quality buyers — which just clarified to the world that this move was a pretty significant cross-subsidy pricing change,” added Stevens, who is also the former CEO of the Mortgage Bankers Association.
LLPAs are upfront fees based on factors such as a borrower’s credit score and the size of their down payment.
The fees are typically converted into percentage points that alter the buyer’s mortgage rate.
Under the revised LLPA pricing structure, a homebuyer with a 740 FICO credit score and a 15% to 20% down payment will face a 1% surcharge — an increase of 0.75% compared to the old fee of just 0.25%.
When absorbed into a longterm mortgage rate, the increase is the equivalent of slightly less than a quarter percentage point in the mortgage rate.
On a $400,000 loan with a 6% mortgage rate, that buyer could expect their monthly payment to rise by about $40, according to calculations by Stevens.
Meanwhile, buyers with credit scores of 679 or lower will have their fees slashed, resulting in more favorable mortgage rates. For example, a buyer with a 620 FICO credit score with a down payment of 5% or less gets a 1.75% fee discount from the old fee rate of 3.5% for that bracket.
When absorbed into the long-term mortgage rate, that equates to a 0.4% to 0.5% discount.
The FHFA-ordered overhaul of LLPAs affects purchase loans, limited cash-out refinances and cash-out refinance loans.
The revamped pricing matrix also includes the controversial addition of a new charge for buyers with debt-to-income ratios above 40% — a convoluted measure that drew immediate pushback from the Mortgage Bankers Association and other industry groups who warned it would be hard to implement.
After the pushback, FHFA announced last month it would delay the rollout of the debt-to-income fee until at least Aug. 1 — a move it said would “ensure a level playing field for all lenders to have sufficient time to deploy the fee.”
The LLPA fee changes are still slated to take effect on May 1.
‘Troubling’ timing
The fee structure changes are the latest of several moves by the FHFA aimed at boosting affordability for what the agency calls “mission borrowers” — defined as firsttime buyers, low-income borrowers and applicants from underserved communities.
Last year, the FHFA eliminated upfront fees for firsttime buyers who are at or below 100% of their area’s median income, or 120% in areas identified as “high cost.” The agency also raised upfront fees on second homes and some larger mortgage loans.
“The timing of this is troubling,” Pete Mills, senior vice president of residential policy at the MBA, told The Post. “As we start to hit the spring homebuying season, home purchases are demonstrably impacted by the rate increases over the past year. The timing . . . is not ideal.”
“Most borrowers” are likely to see a modest price increase as a result of the fee changes, according to Mills.
Asked about concerns that the changes will hurt highcredit buyers, an FHFA official told The Post the agency was “tasked with ensuring [Fannie and Freddie] fulfill their role in any market condition,” adding that shifts in long-term mortgage rates are a far bigger factor in determining finance conditions in the US housing market.