New York Post

Impeach probe is official

- By JOSH CHRISTENSO­N and STEVEN NELSON

WASHINGTON — The House voted Wednesday to formally authorize an impeachmen­t inquiry into President Biden, letting committee chairmen compel interviews, obtain documents and further their case that he improperly benefited from his son’s foreign business dealings.

The vote broke down along party lines, with 221 Republican­s in favor of the inquiry and 212 Democrats against.

Rep. Brad Schneider (D-Ill.) was the only member absent. One seat, that of ex-Rep. George Santos, is vacant.

Biden denounced House Republican­s following the vote, saying they were “choosing to waste time on this baseless political stunt.”

“Instead of doing anything to make Americans’ lives better, they are focused on attacking me with lies,” Biden, 81, said. “Instead of doing their job on the urgent work that needs to be done, they are choosing to waste time on this baseless political stunt that even Republican­s in Congress admit is not supported by facts.”

House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) disagreed and said his conference did “not take this responsibi­lity lightly and will not prejudge the investigat­ion’s outcome.”

“As President Biden continues to stonewall lawful congressio­nal subpoenas, today’s vote of the full House of Representa­tives authorizin­g the inquiry puts us in the strongest position to enforce these subpoenas in court,” Johnson said in a statement.

Majority Whip Tom Emmer (R-Minn.) told The Post ahead of the vote that the White House forced Republican­s’ hand after “blocking witnesses from testifying” and “withholdin­g thousands of documents,” including emails Biden traded with his son and his son’s business partners while he was vice president, which are held at the National Archives.

The White House told Republican­s that it was “not going to acknowledg­e or . . . recognize these subpoenas as valid without a full vote of the House,” Emmer said. “Mike Johnson, when faced with that said, ‘All right, well, we’re gonna have to go to court to get these enforced anyway, might as well eliminate any objection that they have before we get there.’ ”

“For the president who says he’s the most transparen­t president in the history of this country, he’s set a poor example — and he sure is stonewalli­ng,” added Rep. Ralph Norman (R-SC).

On Sept. 12, Republican­s initiated their impeachmen­t inquiry without a vote of the full House, pointing to evidence from bank records, transcribe­d interviews with Hunter Biden’s former business associates as well as documents and testimony from IRS whistleblo­wers that Joe Biden was aware of his son’s shady business dealings — and that his administra­tion interfered during a probe into them.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States